On Thursday, November 10, 2011 02:55:58 am you wrote: > Yes, that would work, we have tested NFS before. > The amount data is quite huge, for that reason ftp is not interesting, and > that why NFS also has been out of scope. So far. Maybee that transfer time > is acceptable/better than ftp for example ? We should perhaps try that :)
Unlike FTP, you can tune NFS to improve your throughput. Here's some info about doing that: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ar01s05.html That applies to Linux. Not sure how tunable the z/OS side is. - MacK. ----- Edmund R. MacKenty Software Architect Rocket Software 275 Grove Street - Newton, MA 02466-2272 - USA Tel: +1.617.614.4321 Email: m...@rs.com Web: www.rocketsoftware.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
