check these papers for what we did in the Pok test lab:

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/resources/linux_ha_ospf.pdf
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/resources/systems_services_platformtest_z_ospfscaling.pdf
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/resources/ZSW03221-USEN-00.pdf

The first shows our initial OSPF setup to prove that it worked and
formed adjacencies with z/OS over hipersockets and external Cisco
routers.
The second shows how we cloned that setup to 60 guests to see if we
could measure the CPU utilization impact of all the OSPF link state
monitoring activity, as well as route reconvergance when link states
change.
The last shows some scripting we wrote to see if we could use OSPF to
automagically make use of hipersockets to talk to peer lpars and OSA
to talk to the other systems even while using z/VM 6.2's SSI Live
Guest Relocation capability to move guests around to different
processors.

More directly related to your question - we never really used the
telnet command interface to interact with zebra or ospfd, we edited
the config files in /etc/quagga and restarted the daemons. There's
lots of examples in the papers.

--
Jay Brenneman

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to