Hi, yes, by-path or by-uuid is more reliable than the /dev/dasdX name. The /dev/dasdX name depends on the order that the disks are set online in the system. Depending on the distribution this can not reliably be predicted.
Regards, Stefan On 12.12.18 17:39, Neal Scheffler wrote: > The Linux group expanded the root vg to a second physical dasd volume. > Doing a pvdisplay shows the PV Name of /dev/dasdm1 > zipl.conf was updated to include the parm "rd.dasd=0.0.010a" since > this is part of the root file system. > > After reboot, dasd 010a is now /dev/dasdb1 so the server reboot failed. > > What is the best way to handle this? > Should they be using /dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.010a-part1 to reference > the new dasd? > > Thanks, > Neal > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
