Ansel writes: > > >easily handle. Personally I'm of the opinion that using the BIOS for > >everything possible is a great shortcut. Lots of device drivers talk to > Shouldn't ELKS ultimately be able to run on systems without a BIOS? > Yes, there is nothing inherantly BIOS orientated about ELKS. It is just that in many cases the most efficient drivers are written using the BIOS. A BIOSless machine would require a kernel with no BIOS dependant drivers. About half the drivers we have are already BIOS independant as they work best that way. Al
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Shane Kerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released David Murn
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Riley Williams
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Ansel
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released David Murn
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Dan Olson
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Jakob Eriksson
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Eric J. Korpela
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Gray, David W.