Re: Stability

[Jakob Eriksson]

On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote:

> > The only reason I suggested using 0.1 as the stable tree is because we are
> > currently heading towards making 0.1.0 a stable version.
> 
> Well we've never applied any idea of stable/not before 1.0 to mainstream
> Linux. I think tradition is 0.x = unfinished

I thougt the opposite (I saw linux first time around 2.0.1x),
but that sounds fine to me.

Jakob