> Yes, I suppose it would be good news also, if only their browser was GPL (or
> some other genuinely free & open-source license). However, AFAICT it is
> thoroughly proprietary.
>
> Maybe they will choose to contribute back to Microwindows. However, since
> Microwindows isn't GPL (it's MPL) they have no obligation to do so.
For a small browser the new gtkhtml work is looking very promising as a core.
Its actually the KDE khtmlw widget (that nice fast but not full of js/java/..
kfm viewer) aka 'konqueror' redone into C with a lot more gui independance.
Once its stable as a gtk widget it seems a good basis for an html viewer
for Nanogui/microwindows.
