I'm not sure if you have posted this yet or not.. but would you mind posting
all of your "stress test" strategies? I would be happy to run through them
this weekend and to test my board better.
thanks,
-Charlie.
> ----------
> From: Valentijn Sessink[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: Discussion List for Linux on Abit Motherboards
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 10:12 AM
> To: Discussion List for Linux on Abit Motherboards
> Subject: Re: [LINUX-ABIT] Re: Details
>
> Chris Chiappa wrote:
>
>
> > We're starting to go through the same stuff we did months ago: "SCSI vs
> IDE"
> > "Powersupplies" etc. Please read the FAQ I've drawn up at
>
> I know. So I don't have extra cooling, I dont' have a 300W powersupply.
> However, there are a couple of instances where a large disk IO on one
> plus some activity on the other processor makes the thing crash. Be it
> SCSI or IDE. (Had a couple of reports on SCSI bus resetting). I *also*
> saw a kernel mailing list message talking about a Dell SMP box that
> crashed... so maybe it is not the BP6 after all. Remember that there are
> many more Linux hackers with a BP6 than there are with other
> multiprocessor boxes, so any SMP error will be very BP6 biased...
>
> The stress testing so far seems mostly kernel compilations or processor
> burn in tests; I had the box running kernel compile for 8 hours, and it
> kept running. I also had a load 80 and it kept running. However, large
> disk IO operations seem to make it crash.
>
> Also, I'd still like to know about the "nosmp" option - anyone have the
> same results, apart from the reports so far?
>
> V.
> --
> --
> =- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
> =- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
>
--
=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
