Dwayne Jacques Fontenot wrote:
> Well my BP6 dual 366's OC'd to 550 will do it in 1:56 with '-j 2' :-)
> Of course, this is stripped down to only the drivers my machine needs.
> Also, I had primed the fs cache by compiling once before - it's a few seconds
> slower the first time.
That's strange.. I have dual 466's oc'd to 560 or so, and a big kernel,
and it takes 5:50:
make clean
time make -j 8 bzImage
I assume everyone is doing a "make clean" first...
--
Ned Konz
currently: Stanwood, WA
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
homepage: http://www.bike-nomad.com
--
=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than single PII Patrick Cole
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than single PII Robert A. Hayden
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than single PII Zdenek Kabelac
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than single PII Patrick Cole
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than single P... Robert A. Hayden
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than sing... Andre Hedrick
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than... Patrick Cole
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than single P... Rod Roark
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than sing... Patrick Cole
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than... Dwayne Jacques Fontenot
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than... Ned Konz
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than... Dwayne Jacques Fontenot
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than... Harry Miktarian
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than... Rod Roark
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than single P... Charlie Baylis
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] slower than single PII Daniel Smolik
