Kevin,
I think I read it here http://www.teamlambchop.com/ where someobody
benchmarked it.
Mike
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kevin N. Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 11:05 PM
>To: Discussion List for Linux on Abit Motherboards
>Subject: RE: [LINUX-ABIT] new hope for BP6
>
>Disable video and bios caching? Fascinating. Hadn't heard or thought
>of that one. I was always under the impression those settings caused
>the ROM to be cached in RAM, not in the L1 or L2 cache of the CPU -
>beyond that which would occur anytime a memory reference is made of
>course. So switching those off frees up L1 or L2 cache?
>
>Kevin C.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DeWitt, Michael
>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 9:31 PM
>To: 'Discussion List for Linux on Abit Motherboards'
>Subject: RE: [LINUX-ABIT] new hope for BP6
>
>
>I would agree with what Kevin said about the differences in FSB
>contributing to the difference. I think you should also reconsider your
>"benchmark" to the time it takes to complete two units instead of just
>one. I think with 2 seti clients running on the BP6 the SMP benefit
>will become more obvious.
>
>Mike
>
>Also, I believe another tuning trick with Seti is disable video and bios
>caching which will free more cache for seti. The last trick is run cas2
>if your system will support it.
>
>--
>=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
>=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
--
=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
