Hi. On Friday 14 April 2006 00:28, Felix Kuehling wrote: > On Tue, 2006-11-04 at 14:14 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Tuesday 11 April 2006 12:35, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: > > > > if(acpi_during_suspend_resume) > > > > don't generate power button event to confuse user space daemon > > > > > > This patch might be useful useful in setting and unsetting > > > acpi_during_suspend_resume (and also using it, but you should ignore > > > those as they are hacks for a different problem). The equivalent > > > variable in the patch below is acpi_in_suspend. > > > > If you want this to get wider testing, I'll be happy to include it in the > > Suspend2 patchset. > > Just to clarify, software suspend is not affected by this problem. Only > S3, possibly S1 and maybe S4BIOS are affected, though I've never seen > the latter on any real system.
Thanks. I still think it would be worth including, because Suspend2 (and now uswsusp, I believe) lets you choose what to do after writing the image. One of the options is suspending to ram, so that you effectively get disk-backed suspend to ram. It might be useful in this situation. Regards, Nigel
pgpPitYtmNnRs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
