Quoting r. Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3) > > > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote: > > > > Please revert the patch. I'll fix the wrong error handling. > > > > I'm not sure reverting the patch solves the ACPI problem > > because Michael's kernel seems not having any user of > > bd_claim_by_kobject. > > Yeah, doing a grep does seem to imply that there is no way that those > changes could matter. > > Michael, can you double-check? I think Jun'ichi is right - in your kernel, > according to the config posted on bugzilla, I don't think there should be > a single caller of bd_claim_by_disk, since CONFIG_MD is disabled.
I double-checked, and of course you are right - the issues resurfaced after some more use, even with the patch reverted. I've written some scripts that do some compiles from scratch, and suspend/resume several times. Plan to try bi-secting with that and see what that will come up with. OTOH, from the discussion it seems just randomly pointing a finger at a patch has uncovered some bugs - so maybe we should do this a bit more :) -- MST - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
