On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 19:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 19:09 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Well, where is unregister_time_interpolator() called from? > > > > > > # grep -rn unregister_time_interpolator . > > > ./kernel/timer.c:1893:unregister_time_interpolator(struct > > > time_interpolator *ti) > > > ./include/linux/timex.h:270:extern void > > > unregister_time_interpolator(struct time_interpolator *); > > > > > > I don't see a caller. i386 does not use time interpolator anyway. > > > > > > # find -iname Kconfig | xargs grep TIME_INTERPOLATION > > > ./arch/sparc64/Kconfig:37:config TIME_INTERPOLATION > > > ./arch/ia64/Kconfig:60:config TIME_INTERPOLATION > > > > But clocksource_resume() has no other caller, AFAICS ... > > Eeep ? > > clocksource_resume is called from timekeeping_resume() > > timestatic int timekeeping_resume(struct sys_device *dev) > { > unsigned long flags; > unsigned long now = read_persistent_clock(); > > clocksource_resume(); > .... > } > > keeping_resume() called via the sysdev resume > > static struct sysdev_class timekeeping_sysclass = { > .resume = timekeeping_resume, > .suspend = timekeeping_suspend, > set_kset_name("timekeeping"), > };
Well, apparently, not in -mm2: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/mm/linux-2.6.21-mm2> grep -r -I -l 'timekeeping_resume' * kernel/time/timekeeping.c [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/mm/linux-2.6.21-mm2> grep clocksource_resume kernel/time/timekeeping.c [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/mm/linux-2.6.21-mm2> Hmm? Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html