> > Any reason to not just replace ACPI_RSD_TABLE_SIZE with ARRAY_SIZE?
Probably because ARRAY_SIZE doesn't exist in ACPICA, which is where this code comes from... When we change syntax in ACPICA files in Linux to make it more "beautiful", then it creates more work for me -- as forever on, that syntax difference must be manually compared to upstream ACPICA and Linux -- and that syntax difference causes upstream patches to no longer apply and require hand merging. If you can license your patches to ACPICA files (drivers/acpi/*/*) back to Intel to re-distribute under _both_ licenses at the top of the file, then I'll be happy to apply them. Otherwise, I'm really not excited about creating work for no functional benefit. thanks, -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
