On Sun 2007-07-01 20:54:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Introduce the pm_power_off_prepare() callback that can be registered by the
> interested platforms in analogy with pm_idle() and pm_power_off(), used for
> preparing the system to power off (needed by ACPI).
> 
> This allows us to drop acpi_sysclass and device_acpi that are only defined in
> order to register the ACPI power off preparation callback, which is needed by
> pm_power_off() registered in a much different way.

Well, the acpi way works with more than one piece of code "listening"
for powerdowns... and does not seem that ugly to me.

Okay, so accessing system_state is not _that_ nice... aha, and perhaps
I understand why 1/2 of this series is right... it called prepare for
S4 even when we had shutdown in /sys/power/disk, right?

Hmm. Okay, I think I can ACK both of these patches, but ACPI people
should have chance to comment, and it probably needs to stay in -mm
for a while.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to