On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() to return the value returned
> > by _SxD if the device is supposed to wake up the system from
> > given sleep state and the evaluation of _SxW fails (e.g. _SxW
> > is not present).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> > @@ -472,11 +472,20 @@ int acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(struct de
> > if (acpi_target_sleep_state == ACPI_STATE_S0 ||
> > (wake && adev->wakeup.state.enabled &&
> > adev->wakeup.sleep_state <= acpi_target_sleep_state)) {
> > + acpi_status status;
> > +
> > acpi_method[3] = 'W';
> > - acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, acpi_method, NULL, &d_max);
> > - /* Sanity check */
> > - if (d_max < d_min)
> > + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, acpi_method, NULL,
> > + &d_max);
> > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > + d_max = d_min;
> > + } else if (d_max < d_min) {
> > + /* Warn the user of the broken DSDT */
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING "ACPI: Wrong value from %s\n",
> > + acpi_method);
> > + /* Sanitize it */
> > d_min = d_max;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > if (d_min_p)
> >
>
> this patch looks correct, it fixes the bug where
> _SxD=2, _PRW=x, _SxW was absent, we would return D3 as legal,
> when we should have returned D2.
>
> applied to acpi test.
>
> BTW. We currently don't use *d_min_p
> and I can't imagine when and why we ever would,
> so it would be fine with me if you simplify by deleting it.
It was requested by someone. I can imagine that if _SxW > _SxD, a driver can
decide which state to choose on the basis of some policy we don't know of.
> Also, the last line of this block comment can be deleted,
> though that was true before this patch also:
Not sure what you mean here ...
> acpi_pci_choose_state() block comment can now be updated to delete this line:
>
> * currently we simply return _SxD, if present.
Yes, I'll do that in a separate patch.
Thanks,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
