[ added debian hal maintainer on cc ]
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
>> while checking the missing bits of ACPI_SYSFS_POWER versus
>> ACPI_PROCFS_POWER i also noticed capacity granularity.
>> is that used by anyone?
> IMHO, nobody cares about it.
ack, will add if someone cries.
>> if yes i can send another patch for that too.
> SBS (sbs.c) has cycle_count field, which might be useful too, so you might
> want to show it as well.
i see, need to testboot to see if my first try went right.
>> want to switch debian to ACPI_SYSFS_POWER.
> Good luck!
done on the linux side.
thanks. :)
got the following question:
~/src/hal$ egrep 'voltage_(max|min)_design' -r .
./hald/linux/device.c: if (hal_util_get_int_from_file (path,
"voltage_max_design", &voltage_design, 10)) {
any particular reason the kernel is calling it
cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/voltage_min_design
14400000
shall i send in a patch along the line:
- case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MIN_DESIGN:
+ case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MAX_DESIGN:
val->intval = battery->design_voltage * 1000;
or is it hal beeing silly?
--
maks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
