On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:48:12 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Morton > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hmm, mystery partly solved... as you guessed it, this piece of code > > > > > was not in my tree. > > > > > > > > > > (still, how can this cause autoresume after 5 seconds is a mystery > to > > > > > me). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pavel > > > > > > > > Maybe it doesn't. Andrew saw the autoresume on -rc[2,3] > > > > > > And earlier - I think 2.6.23 does it as well. > > > > But that one at least resumes fine, does it not? > > Nope, the resume-after-five-seconds and black-screen-after-resume have > always been there (I've only had the thing a few months). > > I thought the restoring of the screen after resume is handled by the X > server? I'm using the nv.o driver. Perhaps nvidia's driver handles it > right, dunno. > >
Oh, I have the ATI thingy. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
