Linux-Advocacy Digest #266, Volume #28 Sun, 6 Aug 00 18:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Richard Stallman's Politics (was: Linux is awesome! (Lee Hollaar)
Re: Sort of a comparison, I think. (Bob Hauck)
Re: Linux or Windows 2000 ???? (Jeff Szarka)
Re: Linux or Windows 2000 ???? (Jeff Szarka)
Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: The Failure of the USS Yorktown ("Mike")
Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: can Linux use be so low? I do not believe it. web traffic. (Matthias Warkus)
Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG (MK)
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was: Microsoft
Ruling Too Harsh (MK)
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was: Microsoft
Ruling Too Harsh (MK)
Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG (MK)
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh (MK)
Re: Linux or Windows 2000 ???? (Matthias Warkus)
Re: The truth about Tim Palmer... (Andres Soolo)
Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Hollaar)
Crossposted-To: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Richard Stallman's Politics (was: Linux is awesome!
Date: 6 Aug 2000 19:23:38 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>It is primarily, I believe, due to this part of section 106, enumerating
>what exclusive rights a copyright holder enjoys:
>
>(2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted
> work;
>http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/106.html
>
>It is for precedent, not statute, to define what 'based upon' means and
>the current debate is testament to the fact that this is definitely an
>open-ended discussion as concerns GPL and libraries.
Actually, the copyright statutes could define what "based upon" means,
much like it does many other things in Section 101 and other places.
There is no requirement that definitions come only through "precedent",
and plenty of cases where definitions come from the copyright statutes.
The statutes didn't define "based upon", but they do provide a number of
examples that illustrate what "based upon" encompasses: "a translation,
musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture
version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation,
or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted."
Note that all these examples are similar to taking a computer program
and reimplementing it in another programming language, or modifying it
it in some way. None of them are like writing a computer program to
make use of another computer program that is part of a library.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Hauck)
Subject: Re: Sort of a comparison, I think.
Reply-To: bobh{at}haucks{dot}org
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 19:43:42 GMT
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 13:34:16 -0400, mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Once booted, the only thing that did not run was the TV card and the
>scanner. I knew the UMAX scanner would probably never run on Linux
I have a UMAX scanner that runs fine on Linux. It is, however, one of
the scsi ones. The parallel port ones are not supported.
--
-| Bob Hauck
-| To Whom You Are Speaking
-| http://www.haucks.org/
------------------------------
From: Jeff Szarka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux or Windows 2000 ????
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 16:06:38 -0400
On 4 Aug 2000 18:38:56 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (abraxas) wrote:
>Wrong. It would have been correct if you had said "linux doesnt support
>as many sound cards as windows 2000 does" or something along those lines,
>but it most certianly supports orders of magnitudes more hardware than
>any kind of windows does.
Lets put it this way...
It doesn't support as much MODERN/USER level hardware as well as any
modern flavor of Windows does.
------------------------------
From: Jeff Szarka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux or Windows 2000 ????
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 16:08:29 -0400
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 03:48:20 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Because Linux is a stable ?? Yes, I believe that, but so is W2K.
>>
>
>W2K does have one advantage over NT4. It changes the notorious blue
>screen to a nice small dialog although it still crashes a couple of
>applications that used to work fine in W98.
So you mean your applicatoins crash and the OS doesn't? That sounds
like a stable OS to me.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,soc.singles,alt.society.anarchy,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary
Date: 6 Aug 2000 20:27:25 GMT
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:55:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>3. What prevents you from looking for a job BEFORE leaving your
> current employer?
The fact that you have to go to work ? ( duh! ) Unless you want to explain
to your employer that you need to take a day off to go to a job interview.
--
Donovan
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,soc.singles,alt.society.anarchy,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary
Date: 6 Aug 2000 20:27:25 GMT
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:55:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>3. What prevents you from looking for a job BEFORE leaving your
> current employer?
The fact that you have to go to work ? ( duh! ) Unless you want to explain
to your employer that you need to take a day off to go to a job interview.
--
Donovan
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG
Date: 6 Aug 2000 20:28:51 GMT
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:32:34 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>Who administered any test which would be a public record, available
>for someone to look up?
>
>...ah yes...the army.
>
>Feynman specifically sandbagged on his army entrance examinations
>so that they would not accept him.
Are you saying that they don't let anyone into the army if their IQ is
less than 125 ?
--
Donovan
------------------------------
From: "Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: The Failure of the USS Yorktown
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 20:31:05 GMT
"mlw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> > adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> Isn't it Jesica Hahn, and Tammy Fay Baker?
>
Actually, it's Jessica and Tammy Faye.
Along with the length of his sig file, most of which apparently has meaning
only to himself, the name mangling and the misspelling of Jim Bakker's name
has been pointed out to Aaron before.
He's a spambot. Add him to your killfile, and the world will be a slightly
better place.
-- Mike --
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,soc.singles,alt.society.anarchy,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary
Date: 6 Aug 2000 20:33:24 GMT
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:55:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>Who cries for the employers when there is a worker shortage???
The employers do a darn good job at crying without any help. Take a look
at the lobbying for more H1B's due to the alleged skills shortage in
the tech sector.
--
Donovan
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,soc.singles,alt.society.anarchy,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary
Date: 6 Aug 2000 20:33:24 GMT
On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:55:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>Who cries for the employers when there is a worker shortage???
The employers do a darn good job at crying without any help. Take a look
at the lobbying for more H1B's due to the alleged skills shortage in
the tech sector.
--
Donovan
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthias Warkus)
Subject: Re: can Linux use be so low? I do not believe it. web traffic.
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 21:29:10 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was the 6 Aug 2000 10:55:36 -0700...
...and sid@net <sid@net> wrote:
>
> I was shocked to see this web page, it does web traffic analysis,
> and it claims Linux use is about 0% of total.
>
> check it out, please tell me this can't be true
>
> http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2000/August/os.html
Probably they just evaluated counters on the kind of pages where Linux
people don't tend to go, such as Crappy Flashy Browser-Crashing
Britney Spears Fan Page Of the Day No. 742, or Mary's Cute Pink
Comprehensive Archive of Dawson's Creek Episode Capsules.
mawa
--
WEITER SO
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MK)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 21:24:59 GMT
On 3 Aug 2000 17:33:31 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich) wrote:
>>> I'm surprised that Mr. Kulkis has not tried to convince his elderly
>>> relatives to cure their parasitism by consulting Dr. Kevorkian.
>>It would be much better to just kill social security right now, and
>>let families take care of their elderly relatives directly.
> However, SS has been remarkably efficient at improving the
>standard of living of the elderly.
However, SS has negative return for most of people taking part in
it.
Some benefit. Buying stocks or even treasury bonds is much
better investment.
FYI, in USA ERISA (Employee's Retirement Income Security
Act) simply PROHIBITS, repeat PROHIBITS, privately run
retirement funds to operate on principle of state-run SS!
Because it's ponzi scheme!
Let's see what Ludwig von Mises, the giant of thought, had to say on social
security:
"Paul in the year 1940 saves by paying one hundred dollars to the national
social security institution. He receives in exchange a claim which is virtually
an unconditional government IOU. If the government spends the hundred
dollars for current expenditures, no additional capital comes into existence,
and no increase in the productivity of labor results. The government's IOU is a
check drawn upon the future taxpayer. In 1970 a certain Peter may have
to fulfill the government's promise although he himself does not derive any
benefit from the fact that. Paul in 1940 saved one hundred dollars.... The
trumpery argument that the public debt is no burden because 'we owe it
to ourselves' is delusive. The Pauls of 1940 do not owe it to themselves. It is
the Peters of 1970 who owe it to the Pauls of 1940.... The statesmen of 1940
solve their problems by shifting them to the statesmen of 1970. On that
date the statesmen of 1940 will be either dead or elder statesmen glorying in
their wonderful achievement, social security." -- _The Human Action_, pp. 847-
848
But welcome to Petrich world, where stock representing very real property and
share in income of company is "pokemon card" and blind belief into future
govt's goodness and ability to rip the future taxpayer's off and pay him
in the future is "real benefit".
Go ahead, Petrich, hell, I'll give you a million of future dollars, now you
give me just half of million dollars in pokemon cards of stocks of
GE and Coca-Cola or even treasury bonds.
Petrich, you are clearly imbecile!
>They had once been one of the poorest
>groups, now they are often upper-middle-class.
According to contemporary standards, pretty everyone was very
poor in the past, you dumbass, but the elderly were no significantly
poorer than other groups. Esp. in extended/multi-generational families.
MK
---
The fundamental practice of politics is creating ideology of a noble goal that
justifies theft.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MK)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 21:25:00 GMT
On 3 Aug 2000 17:44:30 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich) wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Loren Petrich wrote:
>
>>> * Businesses also have bureaucracies. And sometimes very obnoxious
>>> bureaucracies.
>>Big deal. They can't do a thing when you say the two magic words:
>>"I quit!"
>
> However, if all the alternatives are equally bad, then
>love-it-or-leave-it won't help.
But apparently you see nothing wrong with taxes being constructed
on basis of "love it or leave it".
It's just voluntary work for many other businesses that is no alternative.
OTOH, in your world tax is actually real alternative and if you don't
like it, leave the country -- the fact that it is not an option for most
of people (as opposed to changing job being a realistic option much
of the time in their lives) all of a sudden doesn't matter.
Obligatory Is Voluntary.
>>> * One can always move to another country.
>>Ever try it?
>
> I've half-thought of doing so if some right-wing fascists take over.
Why, if they built lots of "socialist roads" like Hitler actually did? Fascism
is too much of socialism for you to leave.
MK
---
The fundamental practice of politics is creating ideology of a noble goal that
justifies theft.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MK)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 21:25:03 GMT
On 3 Aug 2000 17:41:56 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich) wrote:
>>> People living hand to mouth have little room to invest, and there
>>> seems to be a sizable sector in the US that are distant from even
>>> _considering_ having a brokerage account.
>>You are using the same static economic model that the Democrats
>>used when they laffed at Arthur Laffer's suggestion that lowering
>>the tax rates would increase tax revenue.
>>Turns out that Laffer was correct.
>
> The Reagan Administration *RAISED* some taxes, such as payroll taxes.
>
>>I was purchasing stock at the age of 12 with money I earned
>>DELIVERING NEWSPAPERS.
>
> Let's see ... at the age of 15, with the stock that Mr. Kulkis
>purchased, he was able to unseat the Board of Directors of some major
>corporation.
Much better chance than influential 50 year old -- or even the group of
experienced and knowledgable 50-year olds -- changing some nonsensical tax or
SIG. Ronald Reagan kicked the Council of Tea Kippers out -- they were
getting taxpayer's money for _testing tea_, the pork, err, the tea council
dated back to the last century, but court has said it was unlawful and the
council got back into "work". If US president could not change that,
who could?!
The 15-year old having a few stocks is in much better position -- the
large stockowners are in the same boat as he is, and 15-year old
can easily count on the owners of large stock trying to do everything
in their power to kick the hell out of incompetent board.
Now position that 15 year old against govt bc SS that gets his
money is run badly.
Tell me, Petrich, why is it that whatever problem you take on,
you screw it up? Even broken clock gets the time right twice
a day, but you can't get it right ever, even a single time. Maybe
deep down there you feel a need to outright negate the truth?
Maybe you sense the truth, but hate it, so you indulge in lies?
But welcome to Petrich world, where govt is good bc govt is good,
even though in reality govt most of the time is simply dysfunctional,
while companies are bad because companies are bad, even though
in reality market pressure leaves them no option but to work effectively
or else company dies sooner or later (evidence indicates that it is
rather sooner than later).
MK
---
The fundamental practice of politics is creating ideology of a noble goal that
justifies theft.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MK)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 21:25:11 GMT
On 5 Aug 2000 03:35:43 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich) wrote:
>>> The only ideologically pure Communist country left is North Korea;
>>> the others have been afflicted by various degrees of creeping capitalism.
>>It's a charade. I've been to Russia on 3 occassions, and there is
>>no capitalism happening there. You can't have capitalism without
>>property rights, and the Duma absolutely refuses to enact such laws.
>
> ROTFL. There is plenty of capitalism in Russia;
Petrich is in his mode of obsessive lying again; it has been shown time
and again that what is there in Russia doesn't qualify as capitalism.
In reality it is technologically advanced neofeudalism.
>what direct
>evidence is there that it's fakery? I mean *direct* evidence.
Exhibit A: Gazprom, one of the biggest oil companies in the world, "created"
with political means and directed by Boris Berezovsky, who effectively got his
"job" due to political games of the elite ruling the country. Now, once Putin
got in place, Berezovsky isn't in -- again for political reasons -- so he's
probably going to be ousted.
Now please demonstrate Clinton ousting some president of say Shell
or Exxon for political reasons. In Russia, business is controlled entirely by
politics, not by economics. In USA business is obviously _influenced_
by politics, but forming, growing and taking over another business isn't
about politics, it's about e.g. being able to collect enough cash or
attracting stockholders otherwise to sell you stock. Just like it was in case
"takeover wars" and Drexel Burnham Lambert bank in eighties.
Russia is no more business and capitalism than Middle Ages feudal
lord appointing one of nobleman to govern one of his bigger castles.
MK
---
The fundamental practice of politics is creating ideology of a noble goal that
justifies theft.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MK)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 21:25:18 GMT
On 6 Aug 2000 08:10:45 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich) wrote:
>>>>> I'd prefer something more honest, such as support for a world
>>>>>government.
>>>>You won't get that from me, I am not in support of such a thing.
>>> So we are back to having national governments and national citizenship.
>>No, you are debating with the false-dilemma error. It's not either or.
> I personally think that anarchism is a utopian pipedream.
You, personally, seem not to be able to put one coherent thought based
on facts, so I don't think your opinion matters for anything.
MK
---
The fundamental practice of politics is creating ideology of a noble goal that
justifies theft.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthias Warkus)
Subject: Re: Linux or Windows 2000 ????
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 23:05:27 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was the Sun, 06 Aug 2000 16:06:38 -0400...
...and Jeff Szarka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4 Aug 2000 18:38:56 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (abraxas) wrote:
>
> >Wrong. It would have been correct if you had said "linux doesnt support
> >as many sound cards as windows 2000 does" or something along those lines,
> >but it most certianly supports orders of magnitudes more hardware than
> >any kind of windows does.
>
> Lets put it this way...
>
> It doesn't support as much MODERN/USER level hardware as well as any
> modern flavor of Windows does.
That phrase is completely mush-minded and you know it. How do you
define "modern"? Fun! How do you define "user-level"? Even more fun!
Go on, do it!
mawa
--
Genius does what it must, and Talent does what it can.
-- Owen Meredith
------------------------------
From: Andres Soolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: The truth about Tim Palmer...
Date: 6 Aug 2000 21:27:40 GMT
Jacques Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... just occurred to me. Good ol' Tim is
> a beta tester for the built-in spell-checker
> of Windows 2001! With hindsight, it was
> obvious, folks, wasn't it? Now watch for
> those service packs...
Hmm. Might be right. Then a next question springs into mind:
is Tim himself aware of all those posting or does the software
post them by itself? Now when Microsoft has resorted to making
its software lie and hide errors in HTML source to monger hate
between MSIE and non-MSIE users, it should be quite possible.
Think what happens when the MSW2001 hits the stores. c.o.l.a
will drown in a robot poster fight! Why don't MSN carry news
again? Might it be so that the users won't notice their
identities are being wrongfully used? Maybe Microsoft is
already preparing assassination of Usenet?
--
Andres Soolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
-- Oscar Wilde
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,soc.singles,alt.society.anarchy,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 17:25:34 -0400
Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:55:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >3. What prevents you from looking for a job BEFORE leaving your
> > current employer?
>
> The fact that you have to go to work ?
Doesn't stop anybody I know.
> ( duh! ) Unless you want to explain
> to your employer that you need to take a day off to go to a job interview.
>
> --
> Donovan
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,soc.singles,alt.society.anarchy,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 17:25:34 -0400
Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:55:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >3. What prevents you from looking for a job BEFORE leaving your
> > current employer?
>
> The fact that you have to go to work ?
Doesn't stop anybody I know.
> ( duh! ) Unless you want to explain
> to your employer that you need to take a day off to go to a job interview.
>
> --
> Donovan
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 17:26:53 -0400
Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:32:34 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>
> >Who administered any test which would be a public record, available
> >for someone to look up?
> >
> >...ah yes...the army.
> >
> >Feynman specifically sandbagged on his army entrance examinations
> >so that they would not accept him.
>
> Are you saying that they don't let anyone into the army if their IQ is
> less than 125 ?
considering that 125 is far above normal, of course not.
But Feynman was specifically trying to stay out of the army.
He convinced the psych. officer that he was absolutely crazy.
> --
> Donovan
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,soc.singles,alt.society.anarchy,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 17:27:35 -0400
Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:55:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>
> >Who cries for the employers when there is a worker shortage???
>
> The employers do a darn good job at crying without any help. Take a look
> at the lobbying for more H1B's due to the alleged skills shortage in
> the tech sector.
Show me ONE company who is not looking for more techs.
>
> --
> Donovan
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
