Linux-Advocacy Digest #206, Volume #33 Sat, 31 Mar 01 00:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (GreyCloud)
Re: Arrrrgh! Hoist the Jolly Roger! ("JS PL")
Re: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:37:32 -0500
Thanks for the covering fire.
I owe you one.
"Joseph T. Adams" wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Roger Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : Lets see... anti-constitutional subversive activity. Like you saying those
> : who believe in a different economic system should be shot? Now that's real
> : "constitutional" of you, aaron. You can't have it both ways -
> : constitutionally and your way. And that is why you are considered ignorant
> : and a nazi by the adults here.
>
> Actually, according to the U.S. Constitution and federal law, Aaron is
> mostly correct.
>
> If you're a U.S. Citizen, but choose to make war against your own
> country, or give aid and comfort to its very numerous enemies (foreign
> or domestic), then you're guilty of treason, a capital crime.
>
> Also, if you conspire to violate the Constitutionally guaranteed
> rights of any U.S. Citizen under color of law, you're guilty of a
> felony, which becomes a capital crime if loss of life results.
>
> Regarding the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), membership in it was once
> held to be illegal for this reason - not because you aren't entitled
> to hold and express any opinions you wish, but because you are not
> entitled to conspire to violate the rights of others.
>
> But right now the CPUSA, though obnoxious, is among the very least of
> our problems. Both of the "mainstream" parties are much worse, since
> they have much more power.
>
> Both major parties advocate and practice socialism (in varying
> degrees), both have *knowingly* caused massive loss of life, liberty
> and property, which they were supposed to protect, and both have
> conspired, very successfully, to make this nation an oligarchy
> masquerading as a democracy, rather than the Republic that by law it
> must be.
>
> Hence, there are a LOT of traitors in our midst. And given the threat
> that they pose to the life, liberty and property of all people (both
> inside the U.S. and elsewhere), I think it is not only reasonable, but
> necessary, that the worst of them be dealt with as the law requires.
>
> Aaron is not advocating that we round up everyone - just those who are
> the most blatantly and obviously guilty. And, so long as these folks
> get an *exceedingly* fair trial, and as long as their sentences are
> somewhat commensurate with their crimes, I am in total agreement with
> him.
>
> I don't want more bloodshed. I think there's been too much already
> (the left's war on unborn children, the right's war on drugs, and
> other kinds too numerous to list). But it is absolutely necessary
> that the crimes against peaceful and law-abiding U.S. Citizens, not to
> mention the nationals of many other countries who have been harmed by
> actions of our so-called "government," be ended. Hopefully, by the
> most peaceful means possible.
>
> I too took an oath to defend the United States, its lawful government,
> its Constitution, its citizens, and its valid laws against all threats
> whether domestic or foreign. So have millions of others. We are
> greatly outnumbered by the traitors at the moment, but times and
> political winds do change, and I remain hopeful that someday we will
> be able to return to a legitimate, federal, Constitutional, republican
> form of government.
>
> Joe
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:39:59 -0500
RTO_Trainer wrote:
>
> Hey Joe,
>
> "Joseph T. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:9a2snv$kv6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Roger Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > : Lets see... anti-constitutional subversive activity. Like you saying
> those
> > : who believe in a different economic system should be shot? Now that's
> real
> > : "constitutional" of you, aaron. You can't have it both ways -
> > : constitutionally and your way. And that is why you are considered
> ignorant
> > : and a nazi by the adults here.
> >
> >
> > Actually, according to the U.S. Constitution and federal law, Aaron is
> > mostly correct.
> >
> > If you're a U.S. Citizen, but choose to make war against your own
> > country, or give aid and comfort to its very numerous enemies (foreign
> > or domestic), then you're guilty of treason, a capital crime.
> >
> > Also, if you conspire to violate the Constitutionally guaranteed
> > rights of any U.S. Citizen under color of law, you're guilty of a
> > felony, which becomes a capital crime if loss of life results.
> >
> > Regarding the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), membership in it was once
> > held to be illegal for this reason - not because you aren't entitled
> > to hold and express any opinions you wish, but because you are not
> > entitled to conspire to violate the rights of others.
> >
> > But right now the CPUSA, though obnoxious, is among the very least of
> > our problems. Both of the "mainstream" parties are much worse, since
> > they have much more power.
> >
> > Both major parties advocate and practice socialism (in varying
> > degrees), both have *knowingly* caused massive loss of life, liberty
> > and property, which they were supposed to protect, and both have
> > conspired, very successfully, to make this nation an oligarchy
> > masquerading as a democracy, rather than the Republic that by law it
> > must be.
> >
> > Hence, there are a LOT of traitors in our midst. And given the threat
> > that they pose to the life, liberty and property of all people (both
> > inside the U.S. and elsewhere), I think it is not only reasonable, but
> > necessary, that the worst of them be dealt with as the law requires.
> >
> > Aaron is not advocating that we round up everyone - just those who are
> > the most blatantly and obviously guilty. And, so long as these folks
> > get an *exceedingly* fair trial, and as long as their sentences are
> > somewhat commensurate with their crimes, I am in total agreement with
> > him.
> >
>
> Have you been reading Aaron's posts for a while?
>
> He throws around accusations of Communism and Nazism very easily. What it
No. I only use them against those who advocates Communist and/or Nazi
policies.
Since you advocate a large number of Communist policies, then I'm gonna
call you a Communist.
If you feel that this is an unfair accusation, then you are free to
tell us of any and all fundamental disagreements you have with
Communism-based policies.
Oh...and accuracy counts, so be specific...TRAITOR.
> amounts to is rounding upo everyone who disagrees with him. I know you
> don't agree with that, I remember you from m.a.m. (I used to be Son of
> ATF).
I.e. police-state goon.
>
> > I don't want more bloodshed. I think there's been too much already
> > (the left's war on unborn children, the right's war on drugs, and
> > other kinds too numerous to list). But it is absolutely necessary
> > that the crimes against peaceful and law-abiding U.S. Citizens, not to
> > mention the nationals of many other countries who have been harmed by
> > actions of our so-called "government," be ended. Hopefully, by the
> > most peaceful means possible.
> >
> > I too took an oath to defend the United States, its lawful government,
> > its Constitution, its citizens, and its valid laws against all threats
> > whether domestic or foreign. So have millions of others. We are
> > greatly outnumbered by the traitors at the moment, but times and
> > political winds do change, and I remain hopeful that someday we will
> > be able to return to a legitimate, federal, Constitutional, republican
> > form of government.
> >
> >
> > Joe
> >
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:57:29 -0800
"Joseph T. Adams" wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Roger Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : Lets see... anti-constitutional subversive activity. Like you saying those
> : who believe in a different economic system should be shot? Now that's real
> : "constitutional" of you, aaron. You can't have it both ways -
> : constitutionally and your way. And that is why you are considered ignorant
> : and a nazi by the adults here.
>
> Actually, according to the U.S. Constitution and federal law, Aaron is
> mostly correct.
>
> If you're a U.S. Citizen, but choose to make war against your own
> country, or give aid and comfort to its very numerous enemies (foreign
> or domestic), then you're guilty of treason, a capital crime.
>
> Also, if you conspire to violate the Constitutionally guaranteed
> rights of any U.S. Citizen under color of law, you're guilty of a
> felony, which becomes a capital crime if loss of life results.
>
> Regarding the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), membership in it was once
> held to be illegal for this reason - not because you aren't entitled
> to hold and express any opinions you wish, but because you are not
> entitled to conspire to violate the rights of others.
>
> But right now the CPUSA, though obnoxious, is among the very least of
> our problems. Both of the "mainstream" parties are much worse, since
> they have much more power.
>
> Both major parties advocate and practice socialism (in varying
> degrees), both have *knowingly* caused massive loss of life, liberty
> and property, which they were supposed to protect, and both have
> conspired, very successfully, to make this nation an oligarchy
> masquerading as a democracy, rather than the Republic that by law it
> must be.
>
> Hence, there are a LOT of traitors in our midst. And given the threat
> that they pose to the life, liberty and property of all people (both
> inside the U.S. and elsewhere), I think it is not only reasonable, but
> necessary, that the worst of them be dealt with as the law requires.
>
> Aaron is not advocating that we round up everyone - just those who are
> the most blatantly and obviously guilty. And, so long as these folks
> get an *exceedingly* fair trial, and as long as their sentences are
> somewhat commensurate with their crimes, I am in total agreement with
> him.
>
> I don't want more bloodshed. I think there's been too much already
> (the left's war on unborn children, the right's war on drugs, and
> other kinds too numerous to list). But it is absolutely necessary
> that the crimes against peaceful and law-abiding U.S. Citizens, not to
> mention the nationals of many other countries who have been harmed by
> actions of our so-called "government," be ended. Hopefully, by the
> most peaceful means possible.
>
> I too took an oath to defend the United States, its lawful government,
> its Constitution, its citizens, and its valid laws against all threats
> whether domestic or foreign. So have millions of others. We are
> greatly outnumbered by the traitors at the moment, but times and
> political winds do change, and I remain hopeful that someday we will
> be able to return to a legitimate, federal, Constitutional, republican
> form of government.
>
> Joe
Thank you! Well put!
--
V
------------------------------
From: "JS PL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Arrrrgh! Hoist the Jolly Roger!
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 00:03:16 -0500
"GreyCloud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> JS PL wrote:
> >
> > "Andy Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > > The only new concept Microsoft have
> > > introduced is the acceptability of unfinished and buggy code!
> >
> > That's strange. According to the United States Patent Office, Microsoft
has
> > introduced MANY more concepts than your one example.
> >
> >
http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetaht
> > ml%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&p=1&f=S&l=50&Query=microsoft&d=pall
> >
> > And a search for Microsoft at http://www.delphion.com/ turned up about
3500
> > results. That's about one new patent every three days since 1975. If I
had
> > no life like the MS bashing regulars here, I might even peruse some of
> > Microsoft's innovative concepts in more depth. But why would I? Their
> > immense success with consumers and developers the least 26 years is
proof
> > enough that they provide excellent products at competitive prices. The
fact
> > that linux is struggling to maintain a 3 to 1000 computer ratio is proof
> > enough that nobody want's anything to do with it on the desktop.
>
> One could argue that if party A has created a concept and that concept
> was stolen and then taken to the patent office by party B, that patent
> doesn't necessarily mean its a new concept... just a new patent.
>
> I disagree on the desktop argument. By serving install fests in our
> local mall, our organization has made it public that there is an
> alternative to microsofts o/s. Many people aren't aware of Linux
> because no one has enough money to advertise Linux during prime time
> TV. Many people that had actually took a test drive of Linux at the
> mall were really impressed and wanted to know how much it cost. We tell
> them they even have another alternative in Linux: download it for free
> or purchase at low cost a distribution. We have shown RedHat, Suse,
> Caldera, Mandrake, and Slackware as the various distributions.
>
> One person wanted to know if he can get a refund from Microsoft if they
> return the software unused and disagree with the license terms. The End
> User License Agreement states that one can, but Microsoft won't honor
> that agreement. Hence the monopoly lawsuits.
I would be willing to bet money that a similar "install fest" at the same
mall where you put up a booth giving out the latest build of Linux and
Microsoft showed up giving out WindowsXP when it's released, the XP line
would be around the block, and the Linux line would be about 1 guy deep and
4 guys wide.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:43:18 -0500
Roger Perkins wrote:
>
> You were going pretty good until you got off on your little conspiracy
> thing. The "both have *knowingly* caused massive loss of life, liberty,,,"
Ignorance is no excuse.
> part. Complete bullshit. Same for your Political Science 101 theories. It
> may be your desire to (1) describe this country in simple terms and (2) to
> cause damage to this country, but you just aren't up to it no matter how
> much you need that simplicity in vision in your life. And "blatant" guilt
> isn't how the US justice system works. You have to be able to prove guilt
> in a court for a specific law. Simply not doing what aaron wants is no
> where close to a crime. And he did say he'd shoot those who wouldn't do
> what he wanted.
>
> Now, your "so called government" comment really pisses me off. It isn't "so
> called" it is duly elected. And frankly, if you don't like it you are free
> to leave. Please take advantage of that right as you are taking advantage
> of other rights to advocate the overthrow of the elected government. I have
> not remorse for those people at Waco, in the Sudan, certainly not even a
> tiny bit for Iraq. I think our government, while it sometimes makes
> mistakes, it is usually in the process of trying to do good. That is in
> strong contrast to just about every other government in the world and
> certainly those in the Middle East. People like you, for whatever reason,
> find that hard to accept. That would be your problem. Same for you comment
> on traitors. The term describes those who knowingly aid our enemies, not
> those who you disagree with. You really need to mature to the point where
> you understand that the way this country works is through compromise, not on
> fanatical adherence to one's point of view without regard to the
> consequences.
>
> Oh yeah, I think your kind are ignorant assholes. Couldn't get away without
> that, could I?
Let's suppose for a moment, Roger, that you are not, in fact, a
fully indoctrinated Communist.
If that is so...then I'm sure that you can specifically name a few
of the ways in which you fundamentally disagree with Communist philosophy.
Accuracy counts, so be precise
>
> Roger
> AIRBORNE!
>
> > and property,
> "Joseph T. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:9a2snv$kv6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Roger Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > : Lets see... anti-constitutional subversive activity. Like you saying
> those
> > : who believe in a different economic system should be shot? Now that's
> real
> > : "constitutional" of you, aaron. You can't have it both ways -
> > : constitutionally and your way. And that is why you are considered
> ignorant
> > : and a nazi by the adults here.
> >
> >
> > Actually, according to the U.S. Constitution and federal law, Aaron is
> > mostly correct.
> >
> > If you're a U.S. Citizen, but choose to make war against your own
> > country, or give aid and comfort to its very numerous enemies (foreign
> > or domestic), then you're guilty of treason, a capital crime.
> >
> > Also, if you conspire to violate the Constitutionally guaranteed
> > rights of any U.S. Citizen under color of law, you're guilty of a
> > felony, which becomes a capital crime if loss of life results.
> >
> > Regarding the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), membership in it was once
> > held to be illegal for this reason - not because you aren't entitled
> > to hold and express any opinions you wish, but because you are not
> > entitled to conspire to violate the rights of others.
> >
> > But right now the CPUSA, though obnoxious, is among the very least of
> > our problems. Both of the "mainstream" parties are much worse, since
> > they have much more power.
> >
> > Both major parties advocate and practice socialism (in varying
> > degrees), both have *knowingly* caused massive loss of life, liberty
> > and property, which they were supposed to protect, and both have
> > conspired, very successfully, to make this nation an oligarchy
> > masquerading as a democracy, rather than the Republic that by law it
> > must be.
> >
> > Hence, there are a LOT of traitors in our midst. And given the threat
> > that they pose to the life, liberty and property of all people (both
> > inside the U.S. and elsewhere), I think it is not only reasonable, but
> > necessary, that the worst of them be dealt with as the law requires.
> >
> > Aaron is not advocating that we round up everyone - just those who are
> > the most blatantly and obviously guilty. And, so long as these folks
> > get an *exceedingly* fair trial, and as long as their sentences are
> > somewhat commensurate with their crimes, I am in total agreement with
> > him.
> >
> > I don't want more bloodshed. I think there's been too much already
> > (the left's war on unborn children, the right's war on drugs, and
> > other kinds too numerous to list). But it is absolutely necessary
> > that the crimes against peaceful and law-abiding U.S. Citizens, not to
> > mention the nationals of many other countries who have been harmed by
> > actions of our so-called "government," be ended. Hopefully, by the
> > most peaceful means possible.
> >
> > I too took an oath to defend the United States, its lawful government,
> > its Constitution, its citizens, and its valid laws against all threats
> > whether domestic or foreign. So have millions of others. We are
> > greatly outnumbered by the traitors at the moment, but times and
> > political winds do change, and I remain hopeful that someday we will
> > be able to return to a legitimate, federal, Constitutional, republican
> > form of government.
> >
> >
> > Joe
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:45:18 -0500
RTO_Trainer wrote:
>
> Hey Joe,
>
> "Joseph T. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:9a2snv$kv6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Roger Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > : Lets see... anti-constitutional subversive activity. Like you saying
> those
> > : who believe in a different economic system should be shot? Now that's
> real
> > : "constitutional" of you, aaron. You can't have it both ways -
> > : constitutionally and your way. And that is why you are considered
> ignorant
> > : and a nazi by the adults here.
> >
> >
> > Actually, according to the U.S. Constitution and federal law, Aaron is
> > mostly correct.
> >
> > If you're a U.S. Citizen, but choose to make war against your own
> > country, or give aid and comfort to its very numerous enemies (foreign
> > or domestic), then you're guilty of treason, a capital crime.
> >
> > Also, if you conspire to violate the Constitutionally guaranteed
> > rights of any U.S. Citizen under color of law, you're guilty of a
> > felony, which becomes a capital crime if loss of life results.
> >
> > Regarding the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), membership in it was once
> > held to be illegal for this reason - not because you aren't entitled
> > to hold and express any opinions you wish, but because you are not
> > entitled to conspire to violate the rights of others.
> >
> > But right now the CPUSA, though obnoxious, is among the very least of
> > our problems. Both of the "mainstream" parties are much worse, since
> > they have much more power.
> >
> > Both major parties advocate and practice socialism (in varying
> > degrees), both have *knowingly* caused massive loss of life, liberty
> > and property, which they were supposed to protect, and both have
> > conspired, very successfully, to make this nation an oligarchy
> > masquerading as a democracy, rather than the Republic that by law it
> > must be.
> >
> > Hence, there are a LOT of traitors in our midst. And given the threat
> > that they pose to the life, liberty and property of all people (both
> > inside the U.S. and elsewhere), I think it is not only reasonable, but
> > necessary, that the worst of them be dealt with as the law requires.
> >
> > Aaron is not advocating that we round up everyone - just those who are
> > the most blatantly and obviously guilty. And, so long as these folks
> > get an *exceedingly* fair trial, and as long as their sentences are
> > somewhat commensurate with their crimes, I am in total agreement with
> > him.
> >
>
> Have you been reading Aaron's posts for a while?
>
> He throws around accusations of Communism and Nazism very easily. What it
No. I only use them against those who advocates Communist and/or Nazi
policies.
Since Roger advocates a large number of Communist policies, then I'm gonna
call him a Communist.
If you feel that this is an unfair accusation, then you are free to
tell us of any and all that Roger fundamentally disagrees with
Communism-based policies.
Oh...and accuracy counts, so be specific...
> amounts to is rounding upo everyone who disagrees with him. I know you
> don't agree with that, I remember you from m.a.m. (I used to be Son of
> ATF).
So, in other words, you're a brother-in-arms with police-state goons.
How...reassuring.
>
> > I don't want more bloodshed. I think there's been too much already
> > (the left's war on unborn children, the right's war on drugs, and
> > other kinds too numerous to list). But it is absolutely necessary
> > that the crimes against peaceful and law-abiding U.S. Citizens, not to
> > mention the nationals of many other countries who have been harmed by
> > actions of our so-called "government," be ended. Hopefully, by the
> > most peaceful means possible.
> >
> > I too took an oath to defend the United States, its lawful government,
> > its Constitution, its citizens, and its valid laws against all threats
> > whether domestic or foreign. So have millions of others. We are
> > greatly outnumbered by the traitors at the moment, but times and
> > political winds do change, and I remain hopeful that someday we will
> > be able to return to a legitimate, federal, Constitutional, republican
> > form of government.
> >
> >
> > Joe
> >
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
