Linux-Advocacy Digest #907, Volume #33 Wed, 25 Apr 01 11:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Impact of Internet (Phlip)
Re: Windows 2000 - It is an excellent product (Chronos Tachyon)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Re: Communism (theRadical)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (Sky King)
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! ("JS PL")
Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1 (Pete Goodwin)
Re: Communism (chrisv)
Re: Windows 2000 - It is a crappy product ("JoFi")
Re: Windows 2000 - It is a crappy product (Donn Miller)
Re: A real programming language for Linux: Smalltalk (Mark Watson)
Re: Communism (theRadical)
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (chrisv)
Re: Communism (theRadical)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (chrisv)
Re: Windows 2000 - It is an excellent product ("JS PL")
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Phlip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.arch,comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.theory,misc.invest.stocks
Subject: Re: Impact of Internet
Date: 25 Apr 2001 13:52:05 GMT
Not sure if anyone hasn't pointed this out yet, but...
>> The internet, in a short time, has proven to be one of the best
>> ways to communicate information ever developed in history. Was
>> this why the guys at CERN developed it to begin with.
CERN invented the Internet?? A short time ago???
>> BWAHA-HA-HA-HA-HA! <<
OH dear me! That was a good one!!
8'-}
--
Phlip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
============== http://phlip.webjump.com ==============
-- Wanted: Marriage counselor who also keeps pet rats --
------------------------------
From: Chronos Tachyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 - It is an excellent product
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:55:56 GMT
On Wed 25 Apr 2001 08:25, "JS PL" <hi everybody!> wrote:
>
> "Chronos Tachyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> message news:F6tF6.27520$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> On Tue 24 Apr 2001 11:33, "JS PL" <hi everybody!> wrote:
>>
>> [Snip]
>> >
>> > Neither does Windows2000 pro. You, once again, are working with false
>> > information. Users can easily burn discs with default user permissions.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > Anyone caring to see for themselves simply install CDRWin from
>> > goldenhawk.com , and burn to your hearts content. I'm sure just about
> any
>> > other app will work too.
>> >
>>
>> This terrifies me. Users should not have the ability to directly send
>> low-level commands to the hardware (ANY hardware) by default.
>
> They don't. Users do not have the ability to install the burning software.
>
>
>
Ahh, so the system is "secure" because it's impossible for people to write
their own self-contained programs. Yeah, that really restores my
confidence.
Hint: Win2K does *not* let normal users burn CDs with its default
settings. Like Eric said, the administrator has to give users permission
to load the ASPI driver. Thank goodness people like you don't actually
write software... *glances at IE5 and LookOut* oh, wait...
--
Chronos Tachyon
Guardian of Eristic Paraphernalia
Gatekeeper of the Region of Thud
[Reply instructions: My real domain is "echo <address> | cut -d. -f6,7"]
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:55:39 GMT
>>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>>
Aaron> Brent R wrote:
>>
>> >> > Modern feminism decries "the patriarchy", and then whines for
>> >> > it to come back and clean up her diapers, because she still hasn't
>> >> > learned to shit in the toilet.
>>
>> >> Jesus man, do you really have to be that crude?
>>
>> >> Be careful Aaron, not all women are like that, I wouldn't even say the
>>
Aaron> I wasn't referring to "all women" is was referring to that body
Aaron> known as "feminism"
>>
>> No, you are talking about a tiny minority of those women who
>> self-identify as feminist. For most women that means that women
>> have equal rights as men. Not the lunatic fringe that declare
>> all heterosexual sex is rape.
Aaron> Thank you for agreeing with me.
So you think most women that call themselves feminists
are not really feminists?
Or do you just have a reading comprehension problem (along
with your poor logic and scientific "thinking").
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:54:58 GMT
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 03:48:20 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>theRadical wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 18:43:17 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >theRadical wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 03:10:20 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:27:59 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:26:20 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:49:32 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:31:15 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:06:25 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >the Democratic Party is a bunch of Marxists, who, knowing that
>using
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >the name Communists would be bad PR, engage in a campaign of
>deception
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >to get the populace of the country to vote for their own
>enslavement.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >ANYBODY who seeks to enslave others sacrifices any claim to his
>own life.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hope that helps.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> which means soooo [sic] much coming from a fucking idiot twat
>such as
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> yourself.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Gonna come say that to my face?
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> i'm still waiting for you to show up to repossess my vehicle and
>> >> >> >> >> >> explain your ridiculous theory that a ship captain is nothing more
>> >> >> >> >> >> that a paper pusher.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Spot the strawman arguments.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> strawman? you threatened to confiscate my car as part of you duties
>> >> >> >> >> as a law enforcement officer.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Wrong on two counts.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >I said, by your logic, I should, as a government agent, be able
>> >> >> >> >to confiscate your car
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> wrong, you said you WERE a government agent
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Yes, I am.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> well then, show up and confiscate my vehicle asshole.
>> >> >
>> >> >That wouldn't be fun...you'd be expecting me.
>> >> >
>> >> >Nah, it's much more fun to snatch it when you least expect it,
>> >> >and have made absolutely no provisions for alternative methods.
>> >> >
>> >> >You know...those alternative methods that you insist EVERYBODY ELSE
>> >> >should be using.
>> >>
>> >> you are nothing but a chicken shit usenet bully. why don't you quit
>> >> spewing your crap and shut the fuck up.
>> >
>> >So, in other words, when TheRaDICKal wants the government to steal
>> >everybody's self-defence tools, that's ok,
>>
>> i NEVER have advocated confiscation of weapons dick head.
>
>..but that's what you dream about every night, isn't it, fascist prick.
not at all asshole. however, thanks for admitting that you lied about
me wanting to "steal everybody's self-defense tools." you make it
very easy to prove you are nothing but a lying sack of shit.
>
>
>>
>> >but if the government
>> >wants to steal TheRaDICKal's car, that's a horrid crime.
>>
>> what government? i am waiting for you to show up and try to take my
>> car you lying piece of shit.
>>
>> talk about strawman.........
>>
>> >
>> >Game
>> >Set
>> >Match.
>>
>> yeah, right.
------------------------------
From: Sky King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:02:23 -0400
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ralsina@my-
deja.com says...
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:10:47 -0400, Sky King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ralsina@my-
> >deja.com says...
> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:45:12 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >Wrong. I enjoy the company of American women very much.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >However, forming a legal association with one is hazardous
> >> >> >to a man's wealth.
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, forming an association with you can be dangerous for a womans
> >> >> health.
> >> >
> >> >Are you asserting that I have a venereal disease?
> >>
> >> Do you? No, I did not assert that.
> >>
> >> >> >> >Smart men don't put their entire life's earnings at the whim of
> >> >> >> >a fickle-minded, self-centered, spoiled little conceited tart,
> >> >> >> >her lawyer, and the willing accomplice in a black robe.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You know, that russian gal you brought? She has the exact
> >> >> >> same rights under american law as any other gal. And sooner
> >> >> >> or later she's going to find out. And half your roy rogers
> >> >> >> card collection will be hers!
> >> >> >
> >Hardly dear. That is why we have prenups. It would be easy to have
> >her marry you in a state or country where she has NO rights to
> >anything. HAHAHAHA
>
> Actually, it all depends on Aaron making her sign a prenup, doesn't it?
> And that doesn't make her have any less or more rights any other woman
> has. Now, since Aaron's contention was that marrying an american woman
> was dangerous to his "wealth", all I said is that marrying a russian
> woman is just as dangerous.
>
> >> And I pointed out to you why you are wrong. Like I said he
could pick a country that does not make the man pay alimony or
a state or country that does not have no-fault divorce laws.
There are many ways to protects ones cash. She may have less rights
depending on where the marriage takes place. India comes to mind.
sky
> moon?
>
> >> >> >But, she doesn't believe it is her right to run off with 1/2 of
> >> >> >the wealth which I accumulated for YEARS before I ever met her.
> >> >>
> >> >> It's not what she believes. It's what the judge says, kid.
> >>
> >No doll its not. Not all countries or states have that law.
> >Tough noogies eh? chuckle
>
> What? Are you telling me there are countries where what the judge says
> is not what goes?
>
> >sky
>
> comet?
>
> >> Note: no response. Maybe Aaron is now planning of radicating in Saudi
> >> Arabia so he can keep his card collection in case of divorce.
> >>
> >> No need there are plenty of places he can get married and keep ALL.
>
> And all those places are quite unfree.
>
> >sky
>
> kite?
>
>
------------------------------
From: "JS PL" <hi everybody!>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:04:12 -0400
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> JS PL wrote:
> >
> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > JS PL wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > > > And your a College Educated Unix Engineer.....who only uses
> > > > Windows..Pffft..
> > > > >
> > > > > Even after I explain the deception, he still doesn't get it.
> > > >
> > > > Explaining something which is possible isn't proof that your doing
it.
> > Your
> > > > using Windows98 and lying about it. Your worse than Devlin who uses
it
> > and
> > > > claims he's forced to do it.
> > > >
> > > > > > After you deal with your own lies, you can begin throwing
> > accusations
> > > > > > around.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, what college campus did you trespass upon?
> > > >
> > > > SDSU - dropped out after a year, and have never looked back.
> > >
> > > Says it all, really.
> >
> > Says what? I was making more at in my twenties way back in the 80's than
you
> > claim to make now!
>
> And racing horses in your twenties makes you a computer expert how,
exactly
One might also ask this of you:
Running Windows 98 exclusively makes you a Unix Administrator how, exactly?
------------------------------
From: Pete Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:45:33 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> It's the default on most unix systems, I'd imagine. Anytime I use
> RealPlayer or MediaPlayer on Windows ME, it brings the entire system to
> a screeching halt (except for the Media Player or Real Player). With
> unix, I can run Real Player and actually do other
> computationally-intensive tasks. Imagine that.
Tried running WinAmp? It's a bit less of a resource hog than Media
player.
> One doesn't have to try too hard to make Windows unresponsive to other
> tasks.
You know, the two Linux distro's I've been using (Mandrake and SuSE)
both install a file indexer which runs after booting. Unfortunately, you
can notice the effect of it running - the whole system feels sluggish.
And that's a simple file indexer.
> Plus, one other bad thing about Windows is that a lot of apps
> "silently" crash without you noticing it, which takes chunks out of the
> overall system reliability.
Which Windows are we talking about here?
> No software is perfect, but Windows is right there at the bottom of the
> heap.
Until, of course, you consider the desktop. At which point the picture
changes radically.
--
---
Pete Goodwin
All your no fly zone are belong to us
My opinions are my own
------------------------------
From: chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:15:10 GMT
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>chrisv wrote:
>>
>> LOL! Maybe right after you "prove" to everyone that you're not
>> actually using Windows 98, right?
>
>The only way to prove it would be to reveal what platform I'm
>actually running.
Yes, I realize that you have an excuse. You always have SOME excuse
for just NOT "answering the damn question" when you bluff has been
called.
------------------------------
From: "JoFi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 - It is a crappy product
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:26:42 +0200
"Chad Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
<snip>
>
> Bingo buddy! Exactly correct. Windows 2K Pro is crappy.
Very intelligent reasoning.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:22:50 -0400
From: Donn Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 - It is a crappy product
Chad Everett wrote:
> Bingo buddy! Exactly correct. Windows 2K Pro is crappy.
If only I could afford the damned thing to find out. I imagine there's
some illegal iso's of Win 2K out there on the web, though.
====== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ======
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
======= Over 80,000 Newsgroups = 16 Different Servers! ======
------------------------------
From: Mark Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A real programming language for Linux: Smalltalk
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:25:38 GMT
Hello Matthew,
re: $500/year license for VisualWorks:
> $500 a year, a rip-off. Now, a one off $500, now that would be worth
> it. Maybe you should email them and inform them that people aren't made
> of money, and if they want a loyal Linux following, charge at a
> reasonable, ONE OFF price.
I pay for a lot of software tools (not VisualWorks yet, but Common LISP,
Prolog, SuSE Linux distros, Windows 2000 uprade). I also need to be
frugal, but I balance that against having high quality development tools.
I have seen programmer productivity reports that seem to indicate that
programmers using a good Smalltalk environment (like VisualWorks, or
IBM's VisualAge for Smalltalk - which is what they wrote VisualAge
for Java in!) are twice as productive as Java programmers (which is
mostly how I earn my living, BTW); I would extrapolate this to indicate
that a good Smalltalk environment might be 4 times as productive as
a C++ environment. (I spent years using C++, wrote 5 C++ books, and
I think that it takes twice as long to design and build a complex system
in C++ as it does in Java).
BTW, there is an EXCELLANT free open source SmallTalk that runs
great on Linux: Squeak (www.squeak.org), that is a lot of fun. Give that
a try!
BTW, part 2: you can always use VisualWorks for free as long as
it is for non-commercial purposes.
-Mark
-- Mark Watson
-- Java and C++ consulting www.markwatson.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:26:04 GMT
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:15:10 GMT, chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> LOL! Maybe right after you "prove" to everyone that you're not
>>> actually using Windows 98, right?
>>
>>The only way to prove it would be to reveal what platform I'm
>>actually running.
>
>Yes, I realize that you have an excuse. You always have SOME excuse
>for just NOT "answering the damn question" when you bluff has been
>called.
next, kulkis will drop the thread and pretend the conversation never
happened. he is nothing than a tired little punk who lies and tries
to intimidate.
------------------------------
From: chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:28:03 GMT
Chronos Tachyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hint: even if I did have some sort of "magic fairy dust" to make arbitrary
>men turn gay, that doesn't mean that they would suddenly find me
>attractive, much less a potential lifemate.
True, but irrelevant. It increases your odds. More gays is a "good
thing" for you.
>Certainly, if I had the
>ability to turn straight people gay, I would also have the ability to turn
>gay people straight, and thus I wouldn't be taking part in this discussion
>in the first place because I already would have turned myself straight.
I don't agree with one word of this.
>Fundamentally, there are only two possibilities about what makes people
>gay: (1) it's something in the brain, and would take neurotropic drugs or
>surgery to alter if it were at all possible, or (2) it's just a choice, and
>everyone is really just bisexual and lying to themselves about it. Based
>on your experience as (presumably) a straight man, which of the two
>possibilities matches up with your experiences?
IMO it's some of each.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:29:30 GMT
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:26:04 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical) wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:15:10 GMT, chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>> LOL! Maybe right after you "prove" to everyone that you're not
>>>> actually using Windows 98, right?
>>>
>>>The only way to prove it would be to reveal what platform I'm
>>>actually running.
>>
>>Yes, I realize that you have an excuse. You always have SOME excuse
>>for just NOT "answering the damn question" when you bluff has been
>>called.
>
>next, kulkis will drop the thread and pretend the conversation never
>happened. he is nothing than a tired little punk who lies and tries
>to intimidate.
should be: "nothing more than"
------------------------------
From: chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:34:44 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) wrote:
>>It can be dangrous for women to walk alone.
>So, women should be forbidden from doing anything that's dangerous?
What a jerk. Are you just a troll now? We know you're not that
stupid...
No reasonable person can leap from "women should have the CHOICE of
carrying a gun for personal protection" to "women should be forbidden
from doing anything that's dangerous".
------------------------------
From: "JS PL" <hi everybody!>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 - It is an excellent product
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:41:11 -0400
"Chronos Tachyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message
> >> This terrifies me. Users should not have the ability to directly send
> >> low-level commands to the hardware (ANY hardware) by default.
> >
> > They don't. Users do not have the ability to install the burning
software.
> Ahh, so the system is "secure" because it's impossible for people to write
> their own self-contained programs. Yeah, that really restores my
> confidence.
So I am assuming that your no longer "terrified". Hopefully your terror has
now been downgraded to "disturbed" by the knowlege that a user would have to
sit down and hand code his own software in his determination to burn a CD on
a system with no burning software installed? Art least with some sedatives
you may finally be able to sleep at night now. I see that happen all the
time BTW. It's becoming the scourge of the industry! Those damn users who
have taken to writing their own software because their admin has set them up
with a burner and there is no software installed. We should all call the DOJ
and see what they are going to do about it!
> Hint: Win2K does *not* let normal users burn CDs with its default
> settings. Like Eric said, the administrator has to give users permission
> to load the ASPI driver. Thank goodness people like you don't actually
> write software... *glances at IE5 and LookOut* oh, wait...
Hint: I already tried it and I *can* burn CD's as a "user" with default user
settings. I didn't do anything except install the CDRWin software, create a
new user, log in as that user and burn a CD.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: 25 Apr 2001 14:30:47 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>>>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>
> Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> >>
> Aaron> Brent R wrote:
> >>
> >> >> > Modern feminism decries "the patriarchy", and then whines for
> >> >> > it to come back and clean up her diapers, because she still
hasn't
> >> >> > learned to shit in the toilet.
> >>
> >> >> Jesus man, do you really have to be that crude?
> >>
> >> >> Be careful Aaron, not all women are like that, I wouldn't even say
the
> >>
> Aaron> I wasn't referring to "all women" is was referring to that body
> Aaron> known as "feminism"
> >>
> >> No, you are talking about a tiny minority of those women who
> >> self-identify as feminist. For most women that means that women
> >> have equal rights as men. Not the lunatic fringe that declare
> >> all heterosexual sex is rape.
>
> Aaron> Thank you for agreeing with me.
>
>So you think most women that call themselves feminists
>are not really feminists?
>
>Or do you just have a reading comprehension problem (along
>with your poor logic and scientific "thinking").
>
a great number of average-woman-on-the-street declaring themselves feminists
think it means something you don't and are unaware of some of the goings on
of NOW and the like who are the political movement of feminism.
>
>--
>Andrew Hall
>(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
----- Posted via NewsOne.Net: Free (anonymous) Usenet News via the Web -----
http://newsone.net/ -- Free reading and anonymous posting to 60,000+ groups
NewsOne.Net prohibits users from posting spam. If this or other posts
made through NewsOne.Net violate posting guidelines, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
