Linux-Advocacy Digest #938, Volume #33 Thu, 26 Apr 01 11:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (Roberto Alsina)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Communism (theRadical)
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Communism (theRadical)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Communism (theRadical)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:04:12 -0400
Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:40:06 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:45:09 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >On 25 Apr 2001 18:42:14 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >>On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:34:44 GMT, chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>>It can be dangrous for women to walk alone.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>So, women should be forbidden from doing anything that's dangerous?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>What a jerk. Are you just a troll now? We know you're not that
> >> >> >>>stupid...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>In the part you snipped, I introduced the stuff about women and walking
> >> >> >>alone by saying "Aaron believes women are better off when they are NOT
> >> >> >>ALLOWED to walk alone".
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >And you believe that women should NOT BE ALLOWED the tools to protect
> >> >> >themselves while they walk alone.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you advocate they should not walk alone, that doesn't make
> >> >> any difference does it? And anyway, I did not. Check the archives.
> >> >>
> >> >> >>>No reasonable person can leap from "women should have the CHOICE of
> >> >> >>>carrying a gun for personal protection" to "women should be forbidden
> >> >> >>>from doing anything that's dangerous".
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Actually, it goes exactly the other way around. Aaron is pro forbidding
> >> >> >>women the right to walk alone, because they would be in danger.
> >> >> >>I am pro giving them that right. You just misunderstood the whole thing.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >But we do understand thay you would like to deny women the right to
> >> >> >protect themselves.
> >> >>
> >> >> You misunderstand. Everyone should be entitled to protect themselves.
> >> >> Women, men, transvestites and tax collectors alike. In fact, they ARE
> >> >> entitled to protect themselves. All that straw is gonna cause you
> >> >> hay fever.
> >> >
> >> >Nice back-pedal into agreeing with what WE have been saying all along.
> >>
> >> You have all along been saying women are better off when they can not leave
> >> their houses without male permission.
> >
> >No. You're agreeing that people should be allowed to have the necessary
> >means (i.e. guns) to defend themselves.
>
> If you say "No." one expects your next sentence will give an alternative
> to what you deny, or show how what you are replying to is wrong, or
> maybe give support to your negative. You need to relax and write more
> coherently.
So you agree that people shoule be allowed to have the necessary
means (i.e. guns) to defend themselves.
>
> >GAME
> >SET
> >MATCH
> >
> >
> >MORON.
>
> Nah, you have not won, and this is not tennis.
>
GAME
SET
MATCH
MORON.
> --
> Roberto Alsina
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:05:08 GMT
>>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>>
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>> >>
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>> >> >>
Aaron> Brent R wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Modern feminism decries "the patriarchy", and then whines for
>> >> >> >> > it to come back and clean up her diapers, because she still hasn't
>> >> >> >> > learned to shit in the toilet.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Jesus man, do you really have to be that crude?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Be careful Aaron, not all women are like that, I wouldn't even say the
>> >> >>
Aaron> I wasn't referring to "all women" is was referring to that body
Aaron> known as "feminism"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> No, you are talking about a tiny minority of those women who
>> >> >> self-identify as feminist. For most women that means that women
>> >> >> have equal rights as men. Not the lunatic fringe that declare
>> >> >> all heterosexual sex is rape.
>> >>
Aaron> Thank you for agreeing with me.
>> >>
>> >> So you think most women that call themselves feminists
>> >> are not really feminists?
>>
Aaron> Most American women who don't even call themselves feminists have a SEVERE
Aaron> "women should be able to take anything a man has, and give nothing
Aaron> in return" attitude.
Aaron> Those who do call themselves feminist advocate the use of kangaroo
Aaron> courts to accomplish it.
>> You did not answer my questions.
>> I am sorry your experience of American women has
>> been so poor.
Aaron> Actually, my own PERSONAL experience has been ok. However, one does
Aaron> not need to personally experience divorce, etc. to know how badly the
Aaron> guys get shafted....all you need to do is pay attention to what is
Aaron> happening to all of the other men around you.
I do. I have personally seen no bad cases. All the divorces
I personally know about were settled on child support, not
alimony. And in the cases where the woman was the larger breadwinner
and joint or paternal custody, the woman paid the child support.
>> I personally know no women that are at all like
>> the ones you seem to think are most American women.
Aaron> You must live in a cave.
Nope, but perhaps I hang with a better crowd than you do.
>> I have read about some, so I do know they exist. However
>> based on personal experience I conclude that they are rare.
Aaron> Come out of your cave, ahole...
Hang with a better crowd.
(assuming you have any friends in the first place).
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: 26 Apr 2001 14:08:46 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:03:18 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:37:22 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:04:51 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:34:44 GMT, chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>>It can be dangrous for women to walk alone.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>So, women should be forbidden from doing anything that's dangerous?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >What a jerk. Are you just a troll now? We know you're not that
>> >> >> >stupid...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In the part you snipped, I introduced the stuff about women and walking
>> >> >> alone by saying "Aaron believes women are better off when they are NOT
>> >> >> ALLOWED to walk alone".
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >No reasonable person can leap from "women should have the CHOICE of
>> >> >> >carrying a gun for personal protection" to "women should be forbidden
>> >> >> >from doing anything that's dangerous".
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Actually, it goes exactly the other way around. Aaron is pro forbidding
>> >> >> women the right to walk alone, because they would be in danger.
>> >> >
>> >> >I never ADVOCATED such a thing.
>> >>
>> >> You said women are better off in Saudi Arabia, where they are forbidden
>> >> from leaving the house unaccompanied.
>> >
>> >From a quality of life standpoint, they are MUCH better off.
>> >
>> >I did not say that it was better in every single respect, I said
>> >that AS A WHOLE, they have a better life.
>>
>> Well, the incredible oppression and lack of freedom apparently
>> are unimportant to you.
>> Perhaps you would be better off in prison. You can't go out,
>> unless you are escorted, but you get three meals a day, and
>> you meet people.
>
>Thank you for admitting that sacrificing one's freedom is the greatest loss.
Well, thank you for accepting that you have two faces.
You feel sacrificing freedom is the greatest loss if it's your freedom,
yet you say Arabian women are better off sacrificing theirs.
It's kinda like when you advocate killing those who tax you to
feed childreni (they "enslave you!), but not who tax you to sustain
the army.
You are a fully fledged hypocrite.
>So, now, your reasons for arguing that Americans should sacrifice
>their freedom is, what again, exactly?
I don't consider all freedoms equally important. But just for
kicks, what freedom do you imagine I am asking you to sacrifice?
>> >> > I merely noted that the women who
>> >> >live in one of the societies where that is the custom, have a much
>> >> >*BETTER* life than what Feminism has given American women.
>> >>
>> >> Well, make up your mind: do you advocate what you believe is worse,
>> >> or you advocate they should not leave the house alone?
>> >
>> >your mental masturbation is unbecoming.
>>
>> I know you prefer actual masturbation, but you have to wait
>> until your mom looks the other way.
>
>Still raping your daughter, eh Roberto?
What a witless comeback.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:10:35 -0400
Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:44:27 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:42:35 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 02:24:23 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >"Roberto Alsina"
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> After immigrating I could become a citizen. Yet you said I "will
> >> >> >> >> never become a juror". That is not something you can possibly know,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Tell us all when you do become a juror within any jurisdiction in the USA.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Let me guess... I immigrate, I naturalize, then I get called, eventually,
> >> >> >> and not disqualify myself, then I am not disqualified during jury selection.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >how much did you bribe the INS people to naturalizes you, you ignorant twit.
> >> >>
> >> >> Who told you I naturalized?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >So, you admit that you have never passed the naturalization test,
> >> >which requires you to demonstrate that you understand the Constition
> >> >(which includes the 2nd Amendment)
> >>
> >> What's a constition? Anyway, I am not bound by your constitution,
> >> knowing it is not important.
> >
> >You claim to be in the United States.
>
> Quotes please. I am not, and have not been, in several years, in the US.
> In fact, I am pretty far from the US.
>
> >As long as you are on US soil, thne you are legally bound by it.
>
> Unless I am a diplomat.
Yes, you are. Diplomats have been tried and imprisoned in the United States.
Diplomatic immunity applies ONLY if the diplomat's government asserts it.
If, for example, a diplomat walked out infront of his embassy, and started
shooting protesters, I can guarantee that he would, at the very least,
rot in prison for the rest of his natural life.
>
> >Hope that helps.
>
> It helps seing you have some strange thoughts in your mind that I
> have no clue where they came from.
>
> >> I have not passed the naturalization test because I have no need
> >
> >No surprise there.
>
> Indeed.
So, you admit that your understanding of the philosophical foundation
of the US constitution, and the liberties it guarantees, is sufficiently
less than your endorsement of the oppressive "government is always right,
the poeple cannot be trusted" police state from which you came.
My suggestion, Roberto, is that if you don't appreciate living
in a free society, that you go back to the fascist hole you
crawled out of.
>
> >> for it, Aaron, I am a citizen of where I live.
> >
> >And from what you have said so far, you couldn't pass the
> >test if you tried
>
> Oh, I can lie in tests adeptly.
So, you admit that you are untrustworthy.
>
> >You're still bound by the US Constitution as long as you are within
> >the borders of the United States.
>
> Really? Gee, maybe I knew that already when I said I am not
> bound by the US constitution.
Try murdering someone in broad daylight and see what happens,
you fascist pig.
>
> --
> Roberto Alsina
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: 26 Apr 2001 14:10:57 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:04:12 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >GAME
>> >SET
>> >MATCH
>> >
>> >
>> >MORON.
>>
>> Nah, you have not won, and this is not tennis.
>
>GAME
>SET
>MATCH
>
>MORON.
Again, Aaron, this is not tennis. And you should realize that the name
said after "game set match" is the name of the WINNER. So, are you saying
I am a moron and I won (what does that make you?) or are you saying YOU
won, and you are a moron?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:13:43 GMT
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:56:37 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>theRadical wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:39:03 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >theRadical wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:55:22 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:15:10 GMT, chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>chrisv wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> LOL! Maybe right after you "prove" to everyone that you're not
>> >> >> >>> actually using Windows 98, right?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>The only way to prove it would be to reveal what platform I'm
>> >> >> >>actually running.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Yes, I realize that you have an excuse. You always have SOME excuse
>> >> >> >for just NOT "answering the damn question" when you bluff has been
>> >> >> >called.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> next, kulkis will drop the thread and pretend the conversation never
>> >> >> happened. he is nothing than a tired little punk who lies and tries
>> >> >> to intimidate.
>> >> >
>> >> >You lose.
>> >>
>> >> actually, i just haven't won, yet.
>> >
>> >And you never will.
>>
>> wrong.
>>
>> >
>> >The reason you will never win is because you only fight to 'not lose'
>>
>> wrong.
>
>If you never try to win, then your opponent will never lose.
>And if your opponent never loses, then eventually, they will win.
>And if your oppoent wins, then you lose.
that all may be true. however, that is not the case.
>
>Hope that helps, moron.
even if i was (which it is not), it would be better than being an
known liar, liar.
[snip]
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:13:56 -0400
Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:57:36 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> and lying is for dolts like yourself.
> >
> >Speak for yourself, dolt.
>
> Are you saying you have not lied here, Aaron?
>
> Didn't you, when I said marrying you could be dangerous for a woman's
> health say that was not true, only to say, two posts later, that
> you would kill such woman if she ever got alimony from you?
Divorcing =/= marrying
Hope that helps, Master of non-Logic.
>
> --
> Roberto Alsina
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:14:19 GMT
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:57:36 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>theRadical wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:39:32 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >theRadical wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:55:47 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:15:10 GMT, chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>chrisv wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> LOL! Maybe right after you "prove" to everyone that you're not
>> >> >> >>> actually using Windows 98, right?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>The only way to prove it would be to reveal what platform I'm
>> >> >> >>actually running.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Yes, I realize that you have an excuse. You always have SOME excuse
>> >> >> >for just NOT "answering the damn question" when you bluff has been
>> >> >> >called.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> next, kulkis will drop the thread and pretend the conversation never
>> >> >> happened.
>> >> >
>> >> >You lose
>> >> >
>> >> >> he is nothing than a tired little punk who lies and tries
>> >> >> to intimidate.
>> >> >
>> >> >No, I'm an old war vet.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> gee, a unix programmer, war vet, law enforcement officer, maritime
>> >> expert and a constitutional lawyer all rapped up in one foul little
>> >> slimy package.
>> >
>> >Specialization is for morons like yourself.
>>
>> and lying is for dolts like yourself.
>
>Speak for yourself, dolt.
your the liar here shithead.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
soc.men,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:15:45 -0400
theRadical wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:10:10 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Chad Everett wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:28:52 GMT, Scott Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Chad Everett wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:22:58 -0400, Scott D. Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Lynette Warren wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>what a scam American feminism truly is
> >> >> >
> >> >> >How do you define feminism? In feminist theory they are many kinds. A
> >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> >>
> >> >> What the heck is "feminist theory"?
> >> >
> >> >Did you read beyond that point? I explained a bit about it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yes I did. What I gathered is that "feminist theory" is very much like
> >> "bigotry theory".
> >
> >
> >Feminism is a system for oppressing the average men.
> >
> >Males in *elite* positions in our society support it, because they'll
> >use any excuse to oppress other men.
> >
> >
> >Hope that helps.
>
> more ignorant ramblings of a proven liar.
Tell us again about how you think everyone need to "prove" their
need for a gun before owning one.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:15:03 GMT
On 26 Apr 2001 13:59:33 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:57:36 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> and lying is for dolts like yourself.
>>
>>Speak for yourself, dolt.
>
>Are you saying you have not lied here, Aaron?
>
>Didn't you, when I said marrying you could be dangerous for a woman's
>health say that was not true, only to say, two posts later, that
>you would kill such woman if she ever got alimony from you?
he's pathological, anything to try to win an argument.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
