Linux-Advocacy Digest #964, Volume #33 Thu, 26 Apr 01 21:13:02 EDT
Contents:
Re: Women's rights and responsibilities. (GreyCloud)
Re: Women's rights and responsibilities -- child support ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Women's rights and responsibilities. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Women's rights and responsibilities. (GreyCloud)
Re: Windows 2K is crappy: a couple of examples (Terry Porter)
Re: Women's rights and responsibilities. (GreyCloud)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Women's rights and responsibilities.
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:52:42 -0700
BrendaLee wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >
> > BrendaLee wrote:
> > >
> > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:22:26 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> > > > > > Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The Scene:
> > > > > > A delivery room, where some bed-hopping slut has just borne the
> > > > > > demon spawn of her most recent DangerAsshole...
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't sleep with "bed-hopping sluts". Nice try.
> > > >
> > > > You need not sleep with a bed-hopping slut for her to name YOU
> > > > the father of the demon spawn of the incarcerated DangerAsshole
> > > > whos actually did the act.
> > > >
> > > > Hope that helps.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >Doctor: Miss....who is the father?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >BHS: Donovan Rebbechi.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd nail her for fraud.
> > > >
> > > > How?
> > > >
> > > > The mother has custody. And in most states, the mother is allowed
> > > > to DENY the collection of any DNA sample from the child, so any
> > > > challenge to paternity becomes significantly more expensive.
> > > >
> > > If I were a man and some woman was trying to pin me as the father
> > > of a child that was not mine, no amount of money would be too
> > > expensive, because whatever the cost is, it would be less than a
> > > lifetime of costs that were not my responsibility.
> >
> > Actually, Brenda, that's part of the scam.
>
> okay, I'm listening
> >
> > If they can push the legal costs of fighting it to a significant fraction
> > (say, the equivalent of 12 years of child support, with NO GUARANEE
> > of victory), then that eliminates a lot of child support challenges
> > right off the bat.
>
> This is true.. And I can see that as happening. Many men are not
> financially equipped to pay the costs of a DNA paternity suit .
> >
> > >
> > > And I was under the impression in the cases of questionable
> > > paternity that a DNA sample could be demanded.
> >
> > Nope. Paternity is still judged on English common law: whoever
> > the mother CLAIMS is the father *IS* the father, until proven
> > otherwise.
>
> Hmmm, I did not know this..
> >
> > > I cannot picture a
> > > court or other such institution demanding a man pay when he is in
> > > doubt of being the natural father.
> >
> > The courts are in the dark ages--when men who were off in some
> > foreign land for over a YEAR before the birth of a child could be,
> > AND STILL ARE, deemed the legal father of the child.
>
> In many respects I believe this to be true. I don't know why the
> court system would not keep current with the times. Any ideas as
> to why that would be the case?
>
> BrendaLee
>
> >
> > The fact that feminists say *NOTHING* about this ridiculous state
> > of affairs (other then defending it) just goes to show how morally
> > bankrupt they are
> >
> > >
> > > BrendaLee
> > > > >
> > > > > > Congratulations, Donovan...you're the proud father of some some kid
> > > > > > who's mother you've never even seen before....but she's heard your
> > > > > > name somewhere before, and knows you have more money than her
> > > > > > lifelong-criminal DangerAsshole.
> > > > >
> > > > > The law only requires child support for your own kids. Can you actually
> > > >
> > > > No, not in THIS universe.
> > > >
> > > > The law in nearly every state requires a man to support any child whose
> > > > birth certificate names him as the father.
> > > >
> > > > > provide a documented example of this sort of thing ? Better, can you
> > > > > show that it is widespread ? I'd submit that in the age of DNA testing,
> > > > > it's pretty easy to prove that someone is or isn't your blood relative.
> > > > >
> > > > > You're grasping at straws.
> > > >
> > > > No. The laws on such things are truly medieval.
> > > >
> > > > If your wife screws around and has 10 kids with the neighbor
> > > > (such as, if you and she are both of blue and blonde hair (both
> > > > are recessive traits), and every one of the kids born during your
> > > > marriage look REMARKABLY like your next door neighbor (including
> > > > his brown eyes and brown hair)....guess what... YOU are the *LEGAL*
> > > > father, and thus, even if you divorce her for her non-stop adultery,
> > > > YOU STILL have to support Her (and your neighbor's) kids.
> > > >
> > > > Your problem, Donovan, is that you believe that "family law", concerning
> > > > this and other such matters is fair and rational.
> > > >
> > > > Newsflash: it's not. In every aspect where there is an imbalance,
> > > > (one side is PRESUMED to be better than the other, or PRESUMED to
> > > > have some responsibility to the other), the imbalance ALWAYS favors
> > > > the woman.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Donovan Rebbechi * http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/ *
> > > > > elflord at panix dot com
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > > > Unix Systems Engineer
> > > > DNRC Minister of all I survey
> > > > ICQ # 3056642
> > > >
> > > > L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
> > > > can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > K: Truth in advertising:
> > > > Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> > > > Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> > > > Special Interest Sierra Club,
> > > > Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> > > > Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> > > > The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> > > > Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
> > > >
> > > > J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> > > > The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> > > > also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
> > > >
> > > > I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> > > > challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> > > > between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> > > > Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
> > > >
> > > > H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> > > > premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> > > > you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> > > > you are lazy, stupid people"
> > > >
> > > > G: Knackos...you're a retard.
> > > >
> > > > F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> > > > adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
> > > >
> > > > E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> > > > her behavior improves.
> > > >
> > > > D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> > > > ...despite (C) above.
> > > >
> > > > C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
> > > >
> > > > B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> > > > method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> > > > direction that she doesn't like.
> > > >
> > > > A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
> > >
> > > --
> > > BrendaLee
> > > Lady DreamCatcher
> > > --------------------
> > > http://www.cocreator.com/ehmka/
> > > -------------------------------------
> > >
> > > brendalee makes the world better by her presence in it.
> > >
> > > ~~jackie 'anakin' tokeman~~
> > >
> > > when you dance with an angel the angel don't change the angel
> > > changes you
> > > ~~jackie 'anakin' tokeman~~
> >
> > --
> > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > Unix Systems Engineer
> > DNRC Minister of all I survey
> > ICQ # 3056642
> >
> > L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
> > can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > K: Truth in advertising:
> > Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> > Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> > Special Interest Sierra Club,
> > Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> > Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> > The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> > Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
> >
> > J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> > The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> > also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
> >
> > I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> > challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> > between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> > Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
> >
> > H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> > premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> > you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> > you are lazy, stupid people"
> >
> > G: Knackos...you're a retard.
> >
> > F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> > adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
> >
> > E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> > her behavior improves.
> >
> > D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> > ...despite (C) above.
> >
> > C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
> >
> > B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> > method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> > direction that she doesn't like.
> >
> > A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
>
> --
> BrendaLee
> Lady DreamCatcher
> --------------------
> http://www.cocreator.com/ehmka/
> -------------------------------------
>
> brendalee makes the world better by her presence in it.
>
> ~~jackie 'anakin' tokeman~~
>
> when you dance with an angel the angel don't change the angel
> changes you
> ~~jackie 'anakin' tokeman~~
>From what I've read so far, Brenda is a fair woman in thought and mind.
Some are real gold diggers. I doubt that Brenda is one of these.
A nurturer, yes.
--
V
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.men
Subject: Re: Women's rights and responsibilities -- child support
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:56:21 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>
> Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Aaron> The mother has custody. And in most states, the mother is allowed
> Aaron> to DENY the collection of any DNA sample from the child, so any
> Aaron> challenge to paternity becomes significantly more expensive.
>
> >> If the mother is claiming paternity, and the alleged father denies it,
> >> the mother has to draw the DNA to prove paternity.
>
> Aaron> Wrong. All she has to do is pull out the Birth Certificate, which has
> Aaron> (surprise, fucking surprise) the name of the man that she told to the
> Aaron> doctor in the deliver room.
>
> Nope, she has the burden of proof if he disputes the paternity (if
> he originally signed the birth certificate, you might have a point).
>
> >> I would like to see a singe cite for the mother being able to asset disputed
> >> paternity with no recourse for the alleged father.
>
> Aaron> She doesn't need to take any legal action to do it, therefore, you are
> Aaron> asking me to prove a negative.
>
> I am asking you to back your words. I read about disputed paternity cases
> a few times a year in the paper, there is always blood testing, generally
> DNA these days.
>
> >> But, knowing you, and your refusal to back your words, I will
> >> not hold my breath.
>
> Aaron> Since you believe that human-originated C02 is bad for the atmosphere,
>
> I did not say that. It would not surprise me if it were true, but
> the data is not yet close to conclusive, so I, unlike you, have not
> yet made up my mind. You see, unlike you, I believe in science and
> evidence, and place facts in front of ideology every time.
>
> Aaron> I suggest you put prove how sincere you are and hold your breath until
> Aaron> the climate is more acceptable to you.
>
> Aaron> Otherwise, you're a hypocrite.
>
> As I did not make that claim, you are stating yet another falsehood.
>
> --
> Andrew Hall
> (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
Wednesday April 25 11:04 AM ET
Non-Biological Dad Must Pay Support
By DENISE LAVOIE, Associated Press Writer
BOSTON (AP) - The state's highest court ruled against a man who tried
to stop making child support payments for a 7-year-old girl after a
DNA test showed she was not his daughter.
The Supreme Judicial Court said the man had waited too long to
challenge his paternity. It was 51/2 years from the girl's birth in
1993 to the time he first went to court.
"I think what's critical is the parent-child relationship and the
reliance that's occurred over the years in this particular case,''
said the mother's lawyer, Pauline Quirion.
The man's lawyer, Thomas Conroy, said his client intends to maintain
regular visits with the girl but objects to having a court impose
mandatory child support payments.
For most of the girl's life, the man she thought was her father made
weekly support payments to the girl's mother. The two were not
married.
Years later, after the man heard rumors from friends that he was not
the father, a fertility specialist told him his low sperm count made
it unlikely he could father a child.
In 1999, after the girl's mother won a court-ordered increase in child
support payments, he took the girl for a DNA test that determined he
was not the father.
He then went to court to try to set aside his acknowledgment of
paternity, entered in court shortly after the girl's birth. He also
requested reimbursement for all the child support he had already paid.
A judge ordered genetic testing and said that if tests established
that the man was not the girl's father, he would be entitled to stop
future support payments.
A lawyer for the girl's mother asked the court to suspend its order
until the case could be heard by the Supreme Judicial Court in
February, and the DNA tests were never done.
In its ruling Tuesday, the top court said that although it cannot
force the man to continue to nurture his relationship with the girl,
``We can ensure that Cheryl, who may be deprived of her father's
affection and longheld assumptions about her paternity, is not also
deprived of the legal rights and financial benefits of a parental
relationship.''
As of February, he had paid about $28,000 in child support.
The names of those involved in the case are impounded under paternity
law in Massachusetts.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.men
Subject: Re: Women's rights and responsibilities.
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:57:13 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>
> Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> >>
> >> >> And I was under the impression in the cases of questionable
> >> >> paternity that a DNA sample could be demanded.
> >>
> Aaron> Nope. Paternity is still judged on English common law: whoever
> Aaron> the mother CLAIMS is the father *IS* the father, until proven
> Aaron> otherwise.
> >>
> >> Can you cite a single state that has a law like this?
>
> Aaron> All 50, as they have no statutory law to supercede the common law.
>
> You failed to provide a single citation.
>
> Aaron> Hope that helps, leftist feeb.
>
> Please name a leftist position of mine.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
Wednesday April 25 11:04 AM ET
Non-Biological Dad Must Pay Support
By DENISE LAVOIE, Associated Press Writer
BOSTON (AP) - The state's highest court ruled against a man who tried
to stop making child support payments for a 7-year-old girl after a
DNA test showed she was not his daughter.
The Supreme Judicial Court said the man had waited too long to
challenge his paternity. It was 51/2 years from the girl's birth in
1993 to the time he first went to court.
"I think what's critical is the parent-child relationship and the
reliance that's occurred over the years in this particular case,''
said the mother's lawyer, Pauline Quirion.
The man's lawyer, Thomas Conroy, said his client intends to maintain
regular visits with the girl but objects to having a court impose
mandatory child support payments.
For most of the girl's life, the man she thought was her father made
weekly support payments to the girl's mother. The two were not
married.
Years later, after the man heard rumors from friends that he was not
the father, a fertility specialist told him his low sperm count made
it unlikely he could father a child.
In 1999, after the girl's mother won a court-ordered increase in child
support payments, he took the girl for a DNA test that determined he
was not the father.
He then went to court to try to set aside his acknowledgment of
paternity, entered in court shortly after the girl's birth. He also
requested reimbursement for all the child support he had already paid.
A judge ordered genetic testing and said that if tests established
that the man was not the girl's father, he would be entitled to stop
future support payments.
A lawyer for the girl's mother asked the court to suspend its order
until the case could be heard by the Supreme Judicial Court in
February, and the DNA tests were never done.
In its ruling Tuesday, the top court said that although it cannot
force the man to continue to nurture his relationship with the girl,
``We can ensure that Cheryl, who may be deprived of her father's
affection and longheld assumptions about her paternity, is not also
deprived of the legal rights and financial benefits of a parental
relationship.''
As of February, he had paid about $28,000 in child support.
The names of those involved in the case are impounded under paternity
law in Massachusetts.
> --
> Andrew Hall
> (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Women's rights and responsibilities.
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:56:11 -0700
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:22:26 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >The Scene:
> > >A delivery room, where some bed-hopping slut has just borne the
> > >demon spawn of her most recent DangerAsshole...
> > >
> > >
> > >Doctor: ...and for the Birth Certicate,...who is the father?
> > >
> > >BHS: (thiking to herself....I can't name the real one....not
> > >only is he a chronic loser, but he's just been sent to the state
> > >penitentiary for the next 15 years)....wha?
> > >
> > >Doctor: Miss....who is the father?
> > >
> > >BHS: Donovan Rebbechi.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Congratulations, Donovan...you're the proud father of some some kid
> > >who's mother you've never even seen before....but she's heard your
> > >name somewhere before, and knows you have more money than her
> > >lifelong-criminal DangerAsshole.
> >
> > Have you ever heard of DNA testing?
>
> DNA testing is useless if you don't have a DNA sample from the kid.
>
> Most women REFUSE to let the man's legal teadm get a DNA sample from the kid.
> And so far, not a single judge has over-ridden a mother's decision to withhold
> DNA evidence from the proceedings.
>
> Hope that helps, MORON.
>
> >
> > --
> > Roberto Alsina
>
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> DNRC Minister of all I survey
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
> can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> K: Truth in advertising:
> Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> Special Interest Sierra Club,
> Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
> J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> G: Knackos...you're a retard.
>
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> her behavior improves.
>
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (C) above.
>
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
> A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
There are ways to get samples of the kid. It would take a P.I. to get
it tho, but it'd be worth it in the long run.
--
V
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Porter)
Subject: Re: Windows 2K is crappy: a couple of examples
Reply-To: No-Spam
Date: 25 Apr 2001 11:08:48 GMT
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:32:35 +0100,
Nigel Feltham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Moved the CD-RW drive to a SuSE 7.1 Linux box and with a few easy
>> and well documented permission settings on a device file and I've
>> got a CD-RW drive that normal users can use to create CDs.
>>
>
> I recently upgraded the CD burner in my dual-boot win98se / mandrake 7.2
> machine from a 2x2x6 speed unit to a 12x10x32 speed unit - the result on
> booting into linux was the system showed no indication that the hardware
> had changed but burning a CDRW disc resulted in a complete disc in about 6
SIX MINUTES!!!! ouch!
My Ricoh 8*8*32 takes a full ten minutes, under Linux (no Windows, dont' touch
the stuff myself)!
> minutes compared to 35 mins with the old drive.
>
> I then booted into win98 - with my existing software I could only burn a
> CDRW at 4x speed so I installed the Adaptec EX-CD software supplied with
> the new drive - the result of this was the machine refused to boot and
> just bluescreened during the boot process. It took nearly 2 hours of
> internet browsing to find the cause of the problem - the file SCSI1HLP.VXD
> installed by the software conflicted with my DVD drive.
>
> There - upgrading a CDRW drive on linux just works without any hassle yet
> upgrading on windows kills the OS and takes hours to find the cause
> (without linux to browse with to find details of problem I'd have had to
> spend most of this week reinstalling Windblows and every application I use).
>
>
>
Gee Nigel,perhaps you should use Win2k, apparently 'hullo I'm braindead' thinks
it rocks ?
Perhaps he will send you a copy in the mail ?
--
Kind Regards
Terry
--
**** ****
My Desktop is powered by GNU/Linux.
1972 Kawa Mach3, 1974 Kawa Z1B, .. 15 more road bikes..
Current Ride ... a 94 Blade
** Registration Number: 103931, http://counter.li.org **
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Women's rights and responsibilities.
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:01:33 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>
> >> And I was under the impression in the cases of questionable
> >> paternity that a DNA sample could be demanded.
>
> Aaron> Nope. Paternity is still judged on English common law: whoever
> Aaron> the mother CLAIMS is the father *IS* the father, until proven
> Aaron> otherwise.
>
> Can you cite a single state that has a law like this?
>
> --
> Andrew Hall
> (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
The laws in our country are base on English Common LAW! Go read it
about first.
Where did you think the law orginated from? Mars?
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
