On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 14:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > From: Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 
> > > Introduce a new accept4() system call.  The addition of this system call
> > 
> > > /* test_accept4.c
> > 
> > > #ifdef __x86_64__
> > > #define SYS_accept4 288
> > > #elif __i386__
> >         ^^^^^^^^
> >     defined(__i386__)
> > 
> > > #define USE_SOCKETCALL 1
> > > #define SYS_ACCEPT4 18
> > > #else
> > > #error "Sorry -- don't know the syscall # on this architecture"
> > > #endif
> > 
> > Anyway, it's just a test program. Succeeded on m68k using socketcall.
> 
> It _should_ work even without the 'defined()'. Didn't it?

Lots of symbols are defined with no value, which will result in an empty
#if expression and a cpp error.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to