On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:18PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Change the acl so that owner@ is granted the permissions set in the
> owner mask.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agrue...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/richacl_compat.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c
> index 9b76fc0..14a1b4b 100644
> --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c
> +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c
> @@ -413,3 +413,49 @@ richacl_propagate_everyone(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
>       }
>       return 0;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * richacl_set_owner_permissions  -  set the owner permissions to the owner 
> mask
> + *
> + * Change the acl so that owner@ is granted the permissions set in the owner
> + * mask.  This leaves at most one efective owner@ allow entry at the 
> beginning
> + * of the acl.

Perhaps also worth nothing here that it's a no-op in the !MASKED or
!WRITE_THROUGH cases and that this does not change the permissions that
the ACL grants.  (The latter wasn't obvious to me at first....  But
this only modifies OWNER@ aces, and in the MASKED & WRITE_THROUGH case
modification of OWNER@ aces doesn't affect permissions.)

Anyway, code looks right to me:

        Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>

--b.

> + */
> +static int
> +richacl_set_owner_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
> +{
> +     unsigned int x = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED;
> +     unsigned int owner_mask = alloc->acl->a_owner_mask & ~x;
> +     unsigned int denied = 0;
> +     struct richace *ace;
> +
> +     if (!((alloc->acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) &&
> +           (alloc->acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED)))
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     richacl_for_each_entry(ace, alloc->acl) {
> +             if (richace_is_owner(ace)) {
> +                     if (richace_is_allow(ace) && !(owner_mask & denied)) {
> +                             richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, owner_mask);
> +                             owner_mask = 0;
> +                     } else
> +                             richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, 0);
> +             } else {
> +                     if (richace_is_deny(ace))
> +                             denied |= ace->e_mask;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     if (owner_mask & (denied |
> +                       ~alloc->acl->a_other_mask |
> +                       ~alloc->acl->a_group_mask)) {
> +             ace = alloc->acl->a_entries;
> +             if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace))
> +                     return -1;
> +             ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE;
> +             ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO;
> +             ace->e_mask = owner_mask;
> +             ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID;
> +     }
> +     return 0;
> +}
> -- 
> 2.4.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to