Hello,

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 03:03:50PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> +static int khugepaged_has_work(void)
> +{
> +     return !list_empty(&khugepaged_scan.mm_head) &&
> +             khugepaged_enabled();
> +}

Hmmm... no biggie but this is a bit bothering.

> @@ -425,7 +447,10 @@ static ssize_t scan_sleep_millisecs_store(struct kobject 
> *kobj,
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
>       khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs = msecs;
> -     wake_up_interruptible(&khugepaged_wait);
> +     if (khugepaged_has_work())
> +             mod_delayed_kthread_work(khugepaged_worker,
> +                                      &khugepaged_do_scan_work,
> +                                      0);

What's wrong with just doing the following?

        if (khugepaged_enabled())
                mod_delayed_kthread_work(...);

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to