On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rap...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 05:20:24PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rap...@iki.fi> wrote: >> > Kernel headers should not use stdint.h. >> >> Including <linux/types.h> breaks compile of library on non-Linux >> archs. Allowing this patch would mean having a different header in >> the fuse lib as the one in the kernel. This is useless complexity and >> a source of bugs. We've already been there, and much prefer the >> current state. > > Hmm. Why should Linux uapi header care about non-Linux platforms? > > If fuse lib already has an embedded copy of this header, why should > this change break anything fuse lib?
It has a copy, but that copy is often updated with new features taken from the kernel. There's no reason to have two different versions of the header file for no good reason. > In my other patches I got review comments that kernel headers should not > use <stdint.h> and also Documentation/CodingStyle section 5 says: > > (e) Types safe for use in userspace. > > In certain structures which are visible to userspace, we cannot > require C99 types and cannot use the 'u32' form above. Thus, we > use __u32 and similar types in all structures which are shared > with userspace. Ok, if you cannot require C99, then the __uXX types are the way to go. But for the fuse API we *can* use C99 types, nothing preventing us from doing it. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html