On Fri 30-10-15 16:01:42, Minchan Kim wrote:
> deactivate_page aims for accelerate for reclaiming through
> moving pages from active list to inactive list so we should
> clear PG_referenced for the goal.

I might be missing something but aren't we using PG_referenced only for
pagecache (and shmem) pages?

> 
> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hu...@google.com>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  mm/swap.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> index d0eacc5f62a3..4a6aec976ab1 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -810,6 +810,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct 
> lruvec *lruvec,
>  
>               del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru + LRU_ACTIVE);
>               ClearPageActive(page);
> +             ClearPageReferenced(page);
>               add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru);
>  
>               __count_vm_event(PGDEACTIVATE);
> -- 
> 1.9.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to