linux-arch  

Messages by Date

• 2007/09/09 [PATCH 2/4] kbuild: enable 'make AFLAGS=...' to add additional options to AS Sam Ravnborg
• 2007/09/09 [PATCH 1/4] kbuild: enable 'make CFLAGS=...' to add additional options to CC Sam Ravnborg
• 2007/09/09 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Denys Vlasenko
• 2007/09/09 kbuild: enable possibility to specify xFLAGS on commandline Sam Ravnborg
• 2007/09/09 Re: [discuss] [patch 3/5] Use extended crashkernel command line on x86_64 Yinghai Lu
• 2007/09/09 Re: [patch 4/5] Use extended crashkernel command line on IA64 Matthew Wilcox
• 2007/09/09 [patch 4/5] Use extended crashkernel command line on IA64 Bernhard Walle
• 2007/09/09 [patch 3/5] Use extended crashkernel command line on x86_64 Bernhard Walle
• 2007/09/09 [patch 5/5] Add documentation for extended crashkernel syntax Bernhard Walle
• 2007/09/09 [patch 2/5] Use extended crashkernel command line on i386 Bernhard Walle
• 2007/09/09 [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line Bernhard Walle
• 2007/09/09 [patch 0/5] Add extended crashkernel command line syntax Bernhard Walle
• 2007/09/06 Re: [PATCH] Removal of dma_cache_(wback|inv|wback_inv) functions Håvard Skinnemoen
• 2007/09/06 Re: [PATCH] Removal of dma_cache_(wback|inv|wback_inv) functions Kyle McMartin
• 2007/09/06 Re: [PATCH] Removal of dma_cache_(wback|inv|wback_inv) functions David Miller
• 2007/09/06 Re: [PATCH] Removal of dma_cache_(wback|inv|wback_inv) functions Paul Mackerras
• 2007/09/06 [PATCH] Removal of dma_cache_(wback|inv|wback_inv) functions Ralf Baechle
• 2007/09/04 Re: Removal of dma_cache_* functions? James Bottomley
• 2007/09/04 Re: Removal of dma_cache_* functions? Ralf Baechle
• 2007/09/04 Re: Removal of dma_cache_* functions? Matthew Wilcox
• 2007/09/04 Re: Removal of dma_cache_* functions? Ralf Baechle
• 2007/09/04 Re: Removal of dma_cache_* functions? James Bottomley
• 2007/09/04 Re: Removal of dma_cache_* functions? Matthew Wilcox
• 2007/09/04 Removal of dma_cache_* functions? Ralf Baechle
• 2007/08/31 Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes Alan Cox
• 2007/08/31 Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes David Miller
• 2007/08/31 Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes Jeff Garzik
• 2007/08/31 Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes Alan Cox
• 2007/08/31 Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes David Miller
• 2007/08/31 Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes Alan Cox
• 2007/08/30 Re: [PATCH] Use helpers to obtain task pid in printks (arch code) Jan Engelhardt
• 2007/08/28 [patch 8/8] bit_spin_lock: use lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 7/8] powerpc: lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 6/8] mips: lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 4/8] ia64: lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 5/8] mips: fix bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 3/8] alpha: lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 1/8] bitops: introduce lock ops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 2/8] alpha: fix bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 0/8] lock bitops and some bitops fixes Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 8/8] bit_spin_lock: use lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 7/8] powerpc: lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 6/8] mips: lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 5/8] mips: fix bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 4/8] ia64: lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 3/8] alpha: lock bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 2/8] alpha: fix bitops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 1/8] bitops: introduce lock ops Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 [patch 0/8] lock bitops and some bitops fixes Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/28 + remove-include-asm-ipch.patch added to -mm tree akpm
• 2007/08/27 Re: [PATCH] Use helpers to obtain task pid in printks (arch code) Joe Perches
• 2007/08/27 [PATCH] Use helpers to obtain task pid in printks (arch code) Pavel Emelyanov
• 2007/08/24 - remove-pci_dac_dma_-apis.patch removed from -mm tree akpm
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Chris Snook
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Denys Vlasenko
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Denys Vlasenko
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Christoph Lameter
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Christoph Lameter
• 2007/08/24 RE: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Luck, Tony
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Denys Vlasenko
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Denys Vlasenko
• 2007/08/24 RE: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Kenn Humborg
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Denys Vlasenko
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Andi Kleen
• 2007/08/24 Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Denys Vlasenko
• 2007/08/24 Re: [rfc] vmalloc: lazy, batched vunmapping Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/24 Re: [rfc] vmalloc: lazy, batched vunmapping David Howells
• 2007/08/23 [rfc] vmalloc: lazy, batched vunmapping Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/23 Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/08/23 Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/23 Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r David Howells
• 2007/08/23 Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/23 Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches David Howells
• 2007/08/22 Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches Matt Mackall
• 2007/08/22 Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches Dave Hansen
• 2007/08/22 Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches Dave Hansen
• 2007/08/22 Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches Dave Hansen
• 2007/08/22 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Adrian Bunk
• 2007/08/22 Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/22 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Ralf Baechle
• 2007/08/22 Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches Ralf Baechle
• 2007/08/22 Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/22 Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r Chris Snook
• 2007/08/22 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Martin Michlmayr
• 2007/08/22 Re: [patch 3/3] mm: variable length argument support Dan Aloni
• 2007/08/22 Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches David Howells
• 2007/08/22 Re: [patch 3/3] mm: variable length argument support Andrew Morton
• 2007/08/22 Re: [patch 3/3] mm: variable length argument support Fengguang Wu
• 2007/08/22 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Jarek Poplawski
• 2007/08/22 Re: [patch 3/3] mm: variable length argument support Peter Zijlstra
• 2007/08/22 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Michal Piotrowski
• 2007/08/22 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Thomas Bogendoerfer
• 2007/08/22 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Jan Engelhardt
• 2007/08/22 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Jarek Poplawski
• 2007/08/22 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Jan Engelhardt
• 2007/08/22 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Jarek Poplawski
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Jarek Poplawski
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Robert P. J. Day
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r Hirokazu Takata
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r Hirokazu Takata
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Valdis . Kletnieks
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Adrian Bunk
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 James Bottomley
• 2007/08/21 RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Oliver Pinter
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Adrian Bunk
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Glauber de Oliveira Costa
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Glauber de Oliveira Costa
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Adrian Bunk
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/21 Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches Matthew Wilcox
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Adrian Bunk
• 2007/08/21 Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches Matthew Wilcox
• 2007/08/21 [RFC][PATCH] introduce TASK_SIZE_OF() for all arches Dave Hansen
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Adrian Bunk
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Kyle McMartin
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Andi Kleen
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Chris Wedgwood
• 2007/08/21 Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Russell King
• 2007/08/21 RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Adrian Bunk
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Chris Snook
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Andi Kleen
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul Mackerras
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Russell King
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Russell King
• 2007/08/21 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures David Miller
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Russell King
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Chris Snook
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Chris Snook
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Herbert Xu
• 2007/08/20 Re: LDD3 pitfalls (was Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures) Chris Snook
• 2007/08/20 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Chris Snook
• 2007/08/18 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/18 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/18 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/18 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/18 LDD3 pitfalls (was Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures) Stefan Richter
• 2007/08/18 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/18 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/18 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_{read,write}() without volatile Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Christoph Lameter
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Herbert Xu
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Arjan van de Ven
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Arjan van de Ven
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Chris Friesen
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Linus Torvalds
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Paul E. McKenney
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Nick Piggin
• 2007/08/17 Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Nick Piggin

• Earlier messages
• Later messages