On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:48:09PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > I'm sorry, I'm completely at the end of my rag over this. I, for > one, can't operate with keeping up with the mainline kernel while > having these kinds of invasive patches outstanding for 4+ months > with zero help, and little prospect of them getting merged. > The same happened with the DMA mmap API. With that, I've now > resorted to merging the ARM version of it and said "bugger the > other architectures." > What it basically comes down to is that a stable kernel series is > not the place for development. It's obvious we're trying to meet > opposing demands with the existing development model, and it just > isn't working. Well, it isn't for me at least.
Well, my efforts on the DMA mmap() issue got completely thwarted by holy penguin pee, so it wasn't for lack of trying. -- wli
