On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 08:03:45PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Hmm, it is against the latest -mm, with a couple of patches > backed out and one or two others applied :P > If you are just interested in looking at the arch code, I think > that should apply to any recent tree. > Otherwise, let me know off list.
I'm only going to fiddle with the sparc32 bits. -- wli
