> Why is PERCPU not suitable for arm? Can't put an output section inside an output section.
>Ditto for i386 __per_cpu_start and __per_cpu_end are defined as relative symbols. But __per_cpu_start and __per_cpu_end are defined as relative symbols in PERCPU(). Using PERCPU for i386 won't work for relocated kernel. >Ditto Same. __per_cpu_start and __per_cpu_end are relative symbols. >Ditto Same. __per_cpu_start and __per_cpu_end are relative symbols. They are different from PERCPU definition. Overall, PERCPU() macro make code cleaner. But above definitions can not fit into the macro. Thanks. -Fenghua - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
