Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Could it be a gcc version difference?
>>
>
> Likely. Well, we can always try it and see how much crap turns up. If
> gcc keeps quiet about it, its certainly an improvement over the dummy loop.
>
> J
You could do both, actually. If gcc sees the end without it, the loop
will simply get dead-code eliminated.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
