On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:15:56PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So... once we've moved all read-mostly variables into __read_mostly, what
> > is left behind in bss?
>
> I had already covered that in the next paragraph which you conveniently
> snipped :)
>
> Anyways I suspect the right solution for that would be more classes
> of variables for even better grouping.
>...
Is there any way to tell gcc that it's still allowed to omit the
variable when it's able to prove it's read-only?
My basic fear with all the __read_mostly, immediate values,... stuff is
that it might interfere with gcc optimizations.
> -Andi
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
