On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> OK, you have to read to the 3rd paragraph.

That one doesn't actually say what the point is either. It just claims 
that there *is* a point that isn't actually explained or mentioned 
further.

> Well the immediate improvement from this actual patch is just that
> it gives better and smaller code for vm_normal_page (even if you
> discount the debug checks in the existing code).

It does no such thing, except for the slow-path that doesn't matter.

So it may optimize the slow-path (PFNMAP/MIXMAP), but the real path stays 
exactly the same from a code generation standpoint (just checking a 
different bit, afaik). 

If those pte_special bits are required for unexplained lockless 
get_user_pages, is this going to get EVEN WORSE when s390 (again) cannot 
do it?

                Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to