On Wed, Feb 09 2011, Dima Zavin wrote: > I don't like this solution of putting the magicly named array into the > board file. What if I want multiple boards to be built into the same > kernel? What if I want multiple tables in case I have different > revisions of the board?
Especially since there is a push by some to be able to build everything into a single kernel. > The more correct way would be to add a function to gpiomux.c to be > able to apply a list of gpiomux configs, something like: > > int msm_gpiomux_config_table(struct msm_gpiomux_cfg *table, int num); Good idea. Although, I think a name like msm_gpiomux_add_configs() might fit better with other namings. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
