Hi Chung
> The below is my environment:
> Kernel Version: linux-3.4
> Card: eMMC4.5 (50MHz DDR mode, 8-bit buswidth) Host controller : dw-
> mmc (DesignWare MMC controller) Benchmark : IOzone
>
> *CFQ Scheduler
> Read : 35MB
> Write : 17MB
>
> *ROW Scheduler
> Read : 28MB
> Write : 17MB
>
> How do you think about this result?
>
I run your cmd of iozone on my setup and got a bit different results:
CFQ scheduler:
204800 16384 27903 27248 40345 40399
READ: 40 MB/sec WRITE: 27 MB/sec
ROW scheduler:
READ: 39.6 MB/sec WRITE: 27MB/sec
As you can see the results are the same for both schedulers.
Anyway, the improvement added by ROW is in scenario of parallel read and write,
which iozone doesn't do so running iozone for comparing ROW to CFQ is useless.
If it's not too difficult I would appreciate if you could run the bellow 2
commands simultaneously on your setup:
adb shell /data/lmdd if=internal of=/data/writefile bs=128k count=3000
adb shell /data/lmdd if=/data/readfile of=internal bs=128k count=3000
You'll see an improvement in throughput when using ROW over CFQ.
We have a patch that also measures latency and we saw that read latency was
also improved greatly when using ROW.
Thanks,
Tanya Brokhman
---
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
