On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 07:23:30PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:35:06AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > ARM and the sub-architectures is already confusing I don't think we need > > to start compounding the problem by allowing random whatever-you-want > > sub-directories from every sub-architecture. > > Confusing? > > I'm not sure about that. It's actually really simple from my perspective: > > arch/arm - the ARM 32-bit architecture > > arch/arm/mach-* - support for a single SoC or a group of similar SoCs > > arch/arm/plat-* - common support for a set of dissimilar SoCs which want > to share code between themselves > > How is that confusing? >
It's the relationship between the arch/arm/mach-* and the arch/arm/plat-* and which ones connect with each other etc, and how the connection was actually done.. For me as a developer I found it confusing vs something that was fully integrated. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
