Lina Iyer <lina.i...@linaro.org> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:18:24AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>Lina Iyer <lina.i...@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.i...@linaro.org>
>>
>>Why the move?  It looks like scm-boot.c still calls into the main
>>scm_call() stuff that still lives under arch/arm/mach-qcom, and not in
>>arm64, so I'm not seeing the motiviation for the change (and the
>>changelog didn't help explain either  :)
>>
>>Kevin
>
> I dint intend on moving the scm-boot for 64 bit purposes, but that
> would be a good argument :) My motivation was to move the scm-boot.h, but
> figured might as well clean up the mach-qcom in the process, per
> guidance.

Thanks for clarifying.

I suspect that should be a separate cleanup series with its own
descriptive changelog, because to me it only looks like a partial
cleanup since only some of the stuff was moved out, and it's not abvious
what it will be sharing that code.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to