On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 10:26 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi Ivan, > > > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:50:46PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > > @@ -527,10 +538,55 @@ static int pmic8xxx_kp_probe(struct platform_device > > > *pdev) > > > > > > > + > > > + kp->row_hold = devm_regmap_field_alloc(kp->dev, kp->regmap, > > > + info->row_hold); > > > + if (IS_ERR(kp->row_hold)) > > > + return PTR_ERR(kp->row_hold); > > > > Why do we have to allocate all regmap fields separately instead of > > embedding them into keypad structure? > > > > No particular reason. Will rework it. >
Oops. struct regmap_field is opaque. It seems that the allocation is the only way that I could have instance of it. Regards, Ivan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
