On Fri, Feb 27 2015 at 15:07 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote:
+int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu)
I’d really like to see if we could make the set_boot_addr and
set_warm_boot_addr have the same interfaces.
I am working on making the interfaces similar. There is some check in
the platsmp.c that uses the cold boot flag array to determine the
present cpus. Do you think, we can ignore that check over there? If that
can be done, I will change the interface for cold boot too.
I don’t see any reason we can’t add qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr() move the
flags such that they only exist in qcom_scm_set_boot_addr and make
qcom_scm_set_boot_addr static.
- k
Looking at this for another minute, I think we should have the interfaces be
something like:
qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr(void * entry, cpumask_t mask);
qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void * entry, cpumask_t mask);
Very similar to what I was thinking. I will send another patchest when I
get to it.
- k
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
