Philip Blundell writes:
> In case anybody on this list is interested: I've made the change below, since
> there were no objections.
Thanks for copying these lists. There shouldn't be any problem, but I
remember that the original reason for the address set so high was that
some versions of ld-linux.so were loaded at 0x8000 by some versions
of the kernel, specifically v2.2 series kernels.
I'd recommend checking v2.2 kernel behaviour before making this change.
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/armlinux.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
_______________________________________________
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
Please visit the above address for information on this list.
