Hi,
According to you, if I adopt the newest kernel, the result is desirable. So I am going
to build new kernel as soon as possible. Could anyone tell me the newest kernel is Ok
or I have to apply the patch to correct the fault?
Regards,
Kenny
----- Original Message -----
From: Hanske;Stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Yu Xuanwei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: Illegal Instruction
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Yu Xuanwei wrote:
>
> > 022869b4 <__pthread_compare_and_swap>:
> ...
> > 22869d0: e3a03001 mov r3, #1 ; 0x1
> > 22869d4: e1043093 swp r3, r3, [r4]
>;=======================>>>>>>> ERROR LINE: illegal instruction
> > 22869d8: e3530000 cmp r3, #0 ; 0x0
> > 22869dc: 0a000001 beq 22869e8 <__pthread_compare_and_swap+0x34>
> > 22869e0: e1a00004 mov r0, r4
>
> This could be the old problem. The swp instruction faults, because the
> page that is adressed in not in RAM but in swap. Somehow the kernel still
> seems unwilling to handle this case.
> Since there are people out there using threads and stumble over this issue
> over and over again, why not simply apply the patch that's been on the
> list some time ago?
>
> sh
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> Please visit the above address for information on this list.
m����+-���)�Ɗ�O�j)fj��b��?�)�Ū�>W����+m�曢��u���)ߢ���*'�{a��b�
