> >However, this is not right in all cases (RiscPC for instance, should not
> >report v3 because it's not capable of the v4 instruction set).
> It's still a v4 processor (can do UMULL and so on), and I suspect RiscPCs are
> in the minority of StrongARM machines now. I'll add a special case to
> identify those though.
Why not ID them as one of the v3 variants that can do extended multiply?
Something like v3L? I don't have the ARM ARM but I remember reading about
this once somewhere...
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
