Re: CATS board IDE anybody?

[Brian Brunswick]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>>IRQ 47 is invalid on this architecture.  It's probably supposed to be 15
>>or 31.
>
>The ALi IDE irqs are indeed supposed to be 14 and 15.  At one point they were 
>46 and 47 but I can't immediately see where that number is coming from now.
>
>p.
>

Well that explains all the lost irq messages that occurred when I changed
that number. It did manage to read the partition table though!
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]