On Fri, 14 May 1999, Nicholas Clark wrote:

> In the last mail Chris Rutter said:
> 
> > On Tue, 11 May 1999, Philip Blundell wrote:
> > 
> > > You probably want to keep them as armv4l-linux, and no I don't think there 
> > > should be a symlink.  What actually lives in these directories, and what knows 
> > > about their location?
> > 
> > Architecture-dependent bits of PERL, as far as I can see.  Except
> > hardly dependent between armv*.
> 
> If you've got dynamic loading the .so (or equivalent files) go in the
> architecture dependent libraries. As do all the modules compiled from
> extensions (whether statically or dynamicly linked), a copy of all .h files
> so that you can compile further extensions without needing to keep the perl
> source tree, and the perl configuration for that architecture (Config.pm, which
> I believe contains a compiled config.sh)
> 
> > I certainly don't see any point in segregating `armv*' just for a load
> > of PERL which AFAICT is identical across any ARM platform.
> 
> Hmm. I think it is correct that perl will be identical on any ARM (32 bit ?)
> platform. However, I think you can achieve this by answering the questions
> about "where do you want the architecture dependent libraries to go?" as
> blah-blah-arm rather than blah-blah-armv4l at ./Configure time.

Simply say arm-linux here - it should work well.

unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to