James Craig said:
> That's fair enough as far as it goes, but would I be completely wrong in
> thinking that when the FPU gives up on an instruction, it will look to
> software exactly as if the instruction was never even started and the FPEM
> will do it's job normally on it?
Yes. The FPU control register contains a lot of state information
which describes why the FPU is bouncing the instruction.
I'm not currently sure if there is a quick solution to the FPU
support - certainly FPEM 2.87 will get confused if the FPU itself
is active.
--
Russell King ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Millbank Electronics Tel: 01825 764811 Fax: 01825 761620
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
