>Couldn't you do it with the extended form of the asm statement that
>GCC supports? That gives a whole lot of control over how parameters
>are passed in and out of the asm block. If the asm block in turn is a
>function call (or syscall) instruction, that may do the job.
Yes, you can do more or less anything with an asm. I thought Adam wanted a
"clean" way to do this with function attributes or the like.
(Actually, an asm that clobbers all registers might well bring the compiler to
a sticky end. It can't always handle that sort of situation properly.)
p.
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
