>Now, what about that extra CVS patch? Where is this CVS thing and how do I
>apply the patch ?
I've appended the patch in question below. See the GCC web site if you are
interested in CVS access.
>>2.9.5 is not 100% compatible with the older versions. Normal programs
>>shouldn't care but gcc and glibc need to know the difference.
>>
>>I hope it will be fixed in glibc before 2.1.2 is actually released, though
>>I can't make any promise.
This was indeed fixed in glibc 2.1.2.
>>As a side note, I am about to change the mainline egcs sources so that
>>a target name of `arm-*-linux-gnu' implies binutils 2.9.5, and a target
>>name of `arm-*-linux-gnuoldld' implies an older version.
This is true in the GCC mainline now, though config.guess has not yet been
updated. It is not in the 2.95 branch but when I get around to making a new
2.95.x patch (hopefully within a couple of days) it will be in there.
p.
Thu Sep 2 00:06:43 1999 Jeffrey A Law ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* fold-const.c (fold_range_test): Do not try to fold the range
test if the rhs or lhs has side effects.
Index: fold-const.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /egcs/carton/cvsfiles/egcs/gcc/fold-const.c,v
retrieving revision 1.69
retrieving revision 1.70
diff -u -p -r1.69 -r1.70
--- fold-const.c 1999/08/27 07:37:16 1.69
+++ fold-const.c 1999/09/02 09:37:20 1.70
@@ -3560,6 +3560,10 @@ fold_range_test (exp)
tree rhs = make_range (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 1), &in1_p, &low1, &high1);
tree tem;
+ /* Fail if anything is volatile. */
+ if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (lhs) || TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (rhs))
+ return 0;
+
/* If this is an OR operation, invert both sides; we will invert
again at the end. */
if (or_op)
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
