>Is this arm:FQDN stuff correct? Should I be looking elsewhere for the root
>of the problem?

No, I don't think this is correct.  Can you tell where it crept in?

>Also, once I do persuade this to work I assume I have to go right back to
>the beginning and compile without the inhibit_libc/threads hack and then
>compile glibc again to get threads support.

Yes.

p.


unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to