Chris Rutter wrote:
>I don't see why it should lead to any more unstable kernels than
>everyone is using at the moment. Most people who I catch building
>their own kernels these days seem to be using binutils 2.9.5 and
>gcc 2.95 -- I think those could fairly be called the `latest tools',
>and I haven't noticed any widespread complaints of instability?
I believe that pretty much all the distribution builders are using these tools
to build their kernels these days. So if there are problems we ought to hear
about them fairly quickly.
The only issue I'm aware of with the "new" tools, as opposed to say GCC 2.8,
is this business with the (2.2-derived) SA-1100 kernels apparently not
working, which nobody has yet found time to debug.
p.
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
